Tomos of 1351

E551856

The Tomos of 1351 is a formal decree of the Eastern Orthodox Church that definitively endorsed Gregory Palamas’s hesychast theology and settled the 14th-century Byzantine dispute over the nature of divine grace and human participation in God.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf document of the Eastern Orthodox Church
ecclesiastical decree
synodal tomos
affirms legitimacy of hesychast practice of inner prayer
possibility of deification (theosis) by grace
alsoKnownAs Synodal Tomos of 1351 NERFINISHED
Tomos of the Council of Constantinople of 1351 NERFINISHED
approvedBy Byzantine emperor John VI Kantakouzenos NERFINISHED
associatedWithCouncil Palamite Councils of Constantinople NERFINISHED
century 14th century
condemns Barlaam of Calabria NERFINISHED
Gregory Akindynos NERFINISHED
anti‑hesychast teachings
countryAtTimeOfIssue Byzantine Empire NERFINISHED
date 1351
declares Gregory Palamas is orthodox in faith NERFINISHED
divine grace is uncreated
the light of the Transfiguration is uncreated
endorsesTheologyOf Gregory Palamas NERFINISHED
field Byzantine theology
follows Tomos of 1347 NERFINISHED
genre dogmatic definition
hasCanonicalForceIn Eastern Orthodox Church NERFINISHED
influenced later Eastern Orthodox dogmatic theology
reception of Gregory Palamas as a Church Father
issuedBy Council of Constantinople of 1351 NERFINISHED
language Greek
placeOfIssue Constantinople NERFINISHED
recognizedBy Eastern Orthodox Church NERFINISHED
regardsAsOrthodox teaching that God is unknowable in essence but knowable in energies
rejects identification of divine grace with created effects
relatedTo Council of Constantinople of 1341 NERFINISHED
Council of Constantinople of 1347 NERFINISHED
religiousTradition Eastern Orthodoxy NERFINISHED
settles 14th‑century Byzantine hesychast controversy
dispute over human participation in God
dispute over the nature of divine grace
statusInOrthodoxy dogmatic authority for Palamite theology
subjectOf scholarly studies in Byzantine theology
supportsDoctrine essence–energies distinction
hesychasm
real human participation in God through divine energies
uncreated divine energies
theologicalOrientation Palamite
topic hesychast controversy
human participation in God
mystical prayer
nature of divine grace

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Hesychast controversy outcomeDocument Tomos of 1351