Kronecker’s lemma

E100233

Kronecker’s lemma is a result in real analysis and summability theory that links the convergence of series with weighted averages of their partial sums, often used in the study of Fourier series and ergodic theorems.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Kronecker’s lemma canonical 1

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (41)

Predicate Object
instanceOf mathematical lemma
result in real analysis
result in summability theory
appliesTo convergent series
weighted sums of partial sums
assumes a_n is monotone decreasing to 0
partial sums s_n = x_1 + … + x_n
sequence of real numbers (a_n)
sequence of real numbers (x_n)
sum_{n=1}^∞ x_n converges
concludes (1/A_n) * sum_{k=1}^n a_k s_k → 0 under suitable conditions
certain weighted averages of partial sums converge to 0
conclusionType limit statement
field Fourier analysis
ergodic theory
real analysis
summability theory
hasVersion complex-valued sequence version
real-valued sequence version
implies Abel-type summability results in some contexts
logicalForm if-then statement about limits of sequences
mathematicalDomain analysis
namedAfter Leopold Kronecker
relatedTo Tauberian theorems
surface form: Abel’s theorem

Tauberian theorems
Tauberian theorems
surface form: Toeplitz theorem
relates convergence of series
weighted averages of partial sums
role auxiliary result in ergodic theory
technical lemma in harmonic analysis
status classical result in summability theory
standard result in graduate real analysis
topic Cesàro summation
surface form: Cesàro-type averages

series of real numbers
summability of series
usedAs tool in proving strong laws in probability and ergodic theory
usedFor control of averages in convergence proofs
usedIn Tauberian theorems
surface form: Tauberian theory

proofs of ergodic theorems
study of Fourier series
summability methods

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Leopold Kronecker notableWork Kronecker’s lemma