Triple
T4597248
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kronecker’s lemma |
E100233
|
entity |
| Predicate | conclusionType |
P57345
|
FINISHED |
| Object | limit statement |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: limit statement | Statement: [Kronecker’s lemma, conclusionType, limit statement]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conclusionType Context triple: [Kronecker’s lemma, conclusionType, limit statement]
-
A.
typicalConclusion
Indicates that one entity is the usual or expected outcome, result, or ending that follows from another entity or situation.
-
B.
concludedBy
Indicates that an event, process, or state is brought to an end or finalized by a specific agent or entity.
-
C.
concludedThat
Indicates that one entity has reached or stated a judgment, inference, or decision about a proposition or situation involving another entity.
-
D.
concludes
Indicates that one entity brings something (such as an event, process, or discussion) to an end or reaches a final decision or judgment about it.
-
E.
concludedWith
Indicates that an event, process, or interaction ended or was finalized by a specific outcome, action, or state.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43cbc014819098b45f435908f88a |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd59420c108190b5c2c5039e964da5 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:27 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd522c811c81909aae4feadae33174 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:57 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd56b5f4648190834eafa666d53caa |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:16 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:11 p.m.