Triple

T6224961
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject opinion in Atkins v. Virginia E139206 entity
Predicate citation P771 FINISHED
Object Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) E266466 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) | Statement: [opinion in Atkins v. Virginia, citation, Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002)
Context triple: [opinion in Atkins v. Virginia, citation, Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002)]
  • A. Atkins v. Virginia chosen
    Atkins v. Virginia is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held executing individuals with intellectual disabilities violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
  • B. opinion in Atkins v. Virginia
    The opinion in Atkins v. Virginia is a landmark 2002 U.S. Supreme Court decision, authored by Justice John Paul Stevens, that held executing individuals with intellectual disabilities violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
  • C. West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988)
    West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that a private physician under contract to provide medical services to state prisoners acts under color of state law for purposes of liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
  • D. Boynton v. Virginia
    Boynton v. Virginia was a 1960 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended federal prohibitions against racial discrimination in interstate bus terminals, helping lay the legal groundwork for the Freedom Rides.
  • E. Virginia v. Black
    Virginia v. Black is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a ban on cross burning carried out with intent to intimidate while clarifying the limits of First Amendment protection for hate speech and symbolic expression.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c008afd3148190b71e9eaa60420dd1 completed March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c062c214c48190b94e7f904e2bf699 completed March 22, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c20dd3dc5c8190bf48da3a90863727 completed March 24, 2026, 4:06 a.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:22 p.m.