Triple
T35129541
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rule 34 – Judgment on the Pleadings |
E1014399
|
entity |
| Predicate | standardOfReviewOnAppeal |
P3850
|
FINISHED |
| Object | errors of law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: errors of law | Statement: [Rule 34 – Judgment on the Pleadings, standardOfReviewOnAppeal, errors of law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: standardOfReviewOnAppeal Context triple: [Rule 34 – Judgment on the Pleadings, standardOfReviewOnAppeal, errors of law]
-
A.
standardOfReview
chosen
Indicates the level and type of scrutiny an authority (such as a court or reviewer) applies when evaluating a prior decision, action, or finding.
-
B.
appealsStandard
Indicates that a decision, ruling, or case is being challenged or reviewed according to a specified legal or procedural standard on appeal.
-
C.
standardOfProof
Indicates the level or degree of certainty required to establish that a claim or allegation is true in a given context.
-
D.
courtReview
Indicates that a court formally examines a decision, action, or case to determine its legality, correctness, or appropriateness.
-
E.
decisionSubjectToAppealOn
Indicates that a particular decision is open to being challenged or reviewed through an appeal process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dd8b6948190aaa32b081816bd94 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd09840ea88190a2e6d7e577ade717 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 9:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd064c49988190afadddbd04d7cb94 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:02 p.m.