Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Korematsu v. United States (majority opinion) | Statement: [Korematsu v. United States (dissent), opposesHoldingOf, Korematsu v. United States (majority opinion)]

Target entity: Korematsu v. United States (majority opinion)
Context triple: [Korematsu v. United States (dissent), opposesHoldingOf, Korematsu v. United States (majority opinion)]

• A. Korematsu v. United States (dissent)
  Korematsu v. United States (dissent) is Justice Robert H. Jackson’s famous Supreme Court opinion condemning the wartime internment of Japanese Americans and warning against validating racial discrimination under the Constitution.
• B. Korematsu v. United States chosen
  Korematsu v. United States is a landmark 1944 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the wartime internment of Japanese Americans, later widely condemned as a grave civil liberties violation.
• C. Hirabayashi v. United States
  Hirabayashi v. United States is a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the wartime curfew and restrictions imposed on Japanese Americans during World War II.
• D. United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.
  United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. is a landmark 1936 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly affirmed the president’s independent and plenary authority in conducting foreign affairs.
• E. Ex parte Endo
  Ex parte Endo is a landmark 1944 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the government could not continue to detain a loyal American citizen of Japanese ancestry in a World War II internment camp.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: opposesHoldingOf
Context triple: [Korematsu v. United States (dissent), opposesHoldingOf, Korematsu v. United States (majority opinion)]

• A. opposedBy chosen
  Indicates that one entity actively resists, disagrees with, or works against the actions, views, or position of another entity.
• B. advocatesAgainst
  Indicates that one entity actively opposes, argues against, or campaigns to prevent or stop another entity, action, or idea.
• C. overcameHoldingOf
  Indicates that one entity successfully defeated, reversed, or nullified another entity’s control, possession, or dominance over something.
• D. officeHoldersMustNot
  Indicates that certain individuals are prohibited from holding specified offices or positions.
• E. didNotHold
  Indicates that an expected event, condition, or relationship failed to occur or be valid.
• F. None of above.