Triple

T2393442
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Property Clause E47593 entity
Predicate citedIn P771 FINISHED
Object Alabama v. Texas
Alabama v. Texas is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court addressed a dispute among states over offshore submerged lands and the scope of federal authority under the Constitution.
E262095 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (4 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Alabama v. Texas | Statement: [Property Clause, citedIn, Alabama v. Texas]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Alabama v. Texas
Context triple: [Property Clause, citedIn, Alabama v. Texas]
  • A. California v. Texas
    California v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act after Congress reduced the individual mandate penalty to zero.
  • B. Texas v. White
    Texas v. White was an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Union to be indestructible and that states could not unilaterally secede from it.
  • C. Arizona v. United States
    Arizona v. United States is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited state authority over immigration enforcement by affirming broad federal power in this area.
  • D. Alabama v. Shelton
    Alabama v. Shelton is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a suspended sentence that may result in imprisonment cannot be imposed unless the defendant was afforded the right to counsel.
  • E. Branch v. Texas
    Branch v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing the constitutionality and application of the death penalty in the wake of the landmark Furman v. Georgia decision.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Alabama v. Texas
Triple: [Property Clause, citedIn, Alabama v. Texas]
Generated description
Alabama v. Texas is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court addressed a dispute among states over offshore submerged lands and the scope of federal authority under the Constitution.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Alabama v. Texas
Target entity description: Alabama v. Texas is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court addressed a dispute among states over offshore submerged lands and the scope of federal authority under the Constitution.
  • A. California v. Texas
    California v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act after Congress reduced the individual mandate penalty to zero.
  • B. Texas v. White
    Texas v. White was an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Union to be indestructible and that states could not unilaterally secede from it.
  • C. Arizona v. United States
    Arizona v. United States is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited state authority over immigration enforcement by affirming broad federal power in this area.
  • D. Alabama v. Shelton
    Alabama v. Shelton is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a suspended sentence that may result in imprisonment cannot be imposed unless the defendant was afforded the right to counsel.
  • E. Branch v. Texas
    Branch v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing the constitutionality and application of the death penalty in the wake of the landmark Furman v. Georgia decision.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88a1c450c81909f61abb8b6863885 completed March 4, 2026, 7:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abc876d48881909e4d6f5ebe430012 completed March 7, 2026, 6:40 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69aeb3da0978819094584cb23194fb3a completed March 9, 2026, 11:49 a.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_69aeb46f882881909294a3698ead865e completed March 9, 2026, 11:52 a.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_69aeb4c715a88190b1009a2cf1d95441 completed March 9, 2026, 11:53 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:57 p.m.