Triple
T22690308
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | CDK4 |
E561032
|
entity |
| Predicate | oncogenicMechanism |
P68675
|
FINISHED |
| Object | gene amplification |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: gene amplification | Statement: [CDK4, oncogenicMechanism, gene amplification]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: oncogenicMechanism Context triple: [CDK4, oncogenicMechanism, gene amplification]
-
A.
pathogenicMechanism
chosen
Indicates the specific biological process or mechanism through which an agent causes disease or pathological effects in a host.
-
B.
hasGeneticMechanism
Indicates that one entity possesses or involves a specific genetic process or mechanism responsible for a trait, function, or effect in another entity.
-
C.
formationMechanism
Indicates the process or mechanism by which something is formed, created, or brought into existence.
-
D.
replicationDefectMechanism
Indicates a mechanism by which the process of replication is impaired, disrupted, or rendered defective.
-
E.
genomicAlteration
Indicates a relationship where an entity has undergone a change or mutation in its genetic material compared to a reference genome.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2454d71b48190a1f80af9f82b6fcf |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:35 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1789a1fd08190bce5fa0babe695d3 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:18 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ee62b2259c819091ed1387a748b9f3 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 7:08 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:13 p.m.