Triple

T2002236
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Poly1305 E43495 entity
Predicate securityAssumption P35052 FINISHED
Object computational hardness of forging MAC without key LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: computational hardness of forging MAC without key | Statement: [Poly1305, securityAssumption, computational hardness of forging MAC without key]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityAssumption
Context triple: [Poly1305, securityAssumption, computational hardness of forging MAC without key]
  • A. securityAspect
    Indicates a relationship where something pertains to, represents, or characterizes a particular aspect or dimension of security.
  • B. securityStatus
    Indicates the current level or condition of protection, risk, or vulnerability associated with an entity or system.
  • C. securityArrangementsBy
    Indicates that one entity is responsible for providing, organizing, or overseeing security arrangements for another entity or situation.
  • D. securityMechanism
    Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as a means or method to protect another entity from threats, vulnerabilities, or unauthorized actions.
  • E. hasSecurityNotion
    Indicates that one entity possesses, defines, or is associated with a particular concept or notion of security in relation to another entity or context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88715dbbc8190b2299e29e955d997 completed March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abb8820cec8190a945e5daeb8c9df6 completed March 7, 2026, 5:32 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abb79e63c08190982c8b44a557266f completed March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abb87b9fc08190a748c278ef2d7dc7 completed March 7, 2026, 5:32 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:37 p.m.