Triple
T18574336
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Snowden leaks |
E453947
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalBasisContested |
P15326
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act | Statement: [Snowden leaks, legalBasisContested, Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalBasisContested Context triple: [Snowden leaks, legalBasisContested, Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act]
-
A.
legalBasis
Indicates the legal rule, authority, or justification under which an action, decision, or status is established or carried out.
-
B.
legalStandingBasis
Indicates the legal grounds or justification on which a party’s standing or authority in a legal matter is based.
-
C.
legalBasisWeakenedBy
Indicates that the legal force, validity, or effectiveness of something is reduced or undermined by another factor, action, or decision.
-
D.
legalDoctrineChallenged
chosen
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
-
E.
contestedAt
Indicates that an event, claim, or outcome is being challenged or disputed at a particular time or place.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d38974308190a9174430ef256b73 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e543c8c0608190afc99235006bf87f |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:06 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e478c98d4c81909d37a0e72c6e7bd0 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6:40 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:43 a.m.