Triple
T16451632
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States v. Nichols |
E399564
|
entity |
| Predicate | holding |
P2237
|
FINISHED |
| Object | The Civil Rights Act of 1875 was unconstitutional insofar as it attempted to prohibit private racial discrimination in public accommodations |
E90815
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Civil Rights Act of 1875 was unconstitutional insofar as it attempted to prohibit private racial discrimination in public accommodations | Statement: [United States v. Nichols, holding, The Civil Rights Act of 1875 was unconstitutional insofar as it attempted to prohibit private racial discrimination in public accommodations]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The Civil Rights Act of 1875 was unconstitutional insofar as it attempted to prohibit private racial discrimination in public accommodations Context triple: [United States v. Nichols, holding, The Civil Rights Act of 1875 was unconstitutional insofar as it attempted to prohibit private racial discrimination in public accommodations]
-
A.
Civil Rights Act of 1875
The Civil Rights Act of 1875 was a U.S. federal law enacted during Reconstruction that aimed to guarantee African Americans equal access to public accommodations and jury service, though it was later struck down by the Supreme Court.
-
B.
The Civil Rights Cases (1883)
chosen
The Civil Rights Cases (1883) were a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down key provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1875, severely limiting federal power to prohibit racial discrimination by private individuals and businesses.
-
C.
Page Act of 1875
The Page Act of 1875 was a U.S. federal law that effectively curtailed immigration from China—especially of women—by targeting and excluding those stereotyped as prostitutes or forced laborers, laying groundwork for later Chinese exclusion policies.
-
D.
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine, legitimizing Jim Crow laws for decades.
-
E.
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
Yick Wo v. Hopkins is an 1886 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially discriminatory enforcement of a facially neutral law violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f2c6778819080fcfae53be8f12a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e32ce06de0819086eea241c6b32223 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 7:04 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a0045979c588190b6f7b249147f3174 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 8:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:10 a.m.