Triple
T10259584
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Publications of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Series A, No. 10 |
E240559
|
entity |
| Predicate | citedAs |
P771
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Lotus (France v. Turkey), P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10
Lotus (France v. Turkey), P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10 is a landmark 1927 judgment of the Permanent Court of International Justice that articulated the “Lotus principle” on the permissibility of state jurisdiction in the absence of prohibitive rules of international law.
|
E851647
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lotus (France v. Turkey), P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10 | Statement: [Publications of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Series A, No. 10, citedAs, Lotus (France v. Turkey), P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lotus (France v. Turkey), P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10 Context triple: [Publications of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Series A, No. 10, citedAs, Lotus (France v. Turkey), P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10]
-
A.
International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953)
The International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953) was a territorial dispute in which the ICJ adjudicated sovereignty over the Channel Islands groups of Les Écréhous and Minquiers between the two states.
-
B.
Court of Cassation of Turkey
The Court of Cassation of Turkey is the country’s highest court of appeals for civil and criminal cases, responsible for ensuring the uniform application of law across lower courts.
-
C.
Matter of France
The Matter of France is the body of medieval legends and epic literature centered on Charlemagne and his paladins, forming one of the principal cycles of European chivalric romance.
-
D.
Contracting Parties to the Permanent Court of Arbitration
The Contracting Parties to the Permanent Court of Arbitration are the states that have acceded to the PCA’s founding conventions and thereby participate in and support its intergovernmental framework for international dispute resolution.
-
E.
Court of Cassation of Lebanon
The Court of Cassation of Lebanon is the country’s highest judicial authority, serving as the supreme court of appeal that ensures uniform interpretation and application of Lebanese law.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Lotus (France v. Turkey), P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10 Triple: [Publications of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Series A, No. 10, citedAs, Lotus (France v. Turkey), P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10]
Generated description
Lotus (France v. Turkey), P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10 is a landmark 1927 judgment of the Permanent Court of International Justice that articulated the “Lotus principle” on the permissibility of state jurisdiction in the absence of prohibitive rules of international law.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lotus (France v. Turkey), P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10 Target entity description: Lotus (France v. Turkey), P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10 is a landmark 1927 judgment of the Permanent Court of International Justice that articulated the “Lotus principle” on the permissibility of state jurisdiction in the absence of prohibitive rules of international law.
-
A.
International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953)
The International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953) was a territorial dispute in which the ICJ adjudicated sovereignty over the Channel Islands groups of Les Écréhous and Minquiers between the two states.
-
B.
Court of Cassation of Turkey
The Court of Cassation of Turkey is the country’s highest court of appeals for civil and criminal cases, responsible for ensuring the uniform application of law across lower courts.
-
C.
Matter of France
The Matter of France is the body of medieval legends and epic literature centered on Charlemagne and his paladins, forming one of the principal cycles of European chivalric romance.
-
D.
Contracting Parties to the Permanent Court of Arbitration
The Contracting Parties to the Permanent Court of Arbitration are the states that have acceded to the PCA’s founding conventions and thereby participate in and support its intergovernmental framework for international dispute resolution.
-
E.
Court of Cassation of Lebanon
The Court of Cassation of Lebanon is the country’s highest judicial authority, serving as the supreme court of appeal that ensures uniform interpretation and application of Lebanese law.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381a7e198819090280d5ab885d59e |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4d24e94e08190ad2b9733bf621fe4 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 9:45 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d6f7e9a9d48190865f047750d7bc6c |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:50 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69d6fcabb5a08190a26c068163f48878 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 1:11 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69d6fd7212b88190b410b8e1cc6f56fd |
completed | April 9, 2026, 1:14 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:32 a.m.