viewOnGod
P5768
predicate
Indicates a relationship where one entity holds or expresses a particular opinion, belief, or perspective about God.
All labels observed (15)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| viewOnGod canonical | 48 |
| viewOnAttributesOfGod | 8 |
| viewOnGods | 5 |
| viewOnBrahman | 4 |
| viewOfShiva | 3 |
| viewOnFather | 3 |
| viewsBrahmanAs | 3 |
| hasViewOnGod | 2 |
| viewOnTengri | 2 |
| considersGod | 1 |
| expressesViewOnGods | 1 |
| viewOnFatherSonSpirit | 1 |
| viewOnGodsNature | 1 |
| viewOnProvidence | 1 |
| viewsOnGod | 1 |
Description generation (PDg)
The one-sentence description above was generated by prompting gpt-5.1 with the predicate name and this instruction.
Instruction
Given a predicate that represents a relationship or action between entities, generate a one-sentence description explaining its meaning. # Instructions Focus on describing the relationship, not the entities themselves. # Response Format Begin the description with \' Indicates...\'
Input
Predicate: viewOnGod
Generated description
Indicates a relationship where one entity holds or expresses a particular opinion, belief, or perspective about God.
Sample triples (84)
| Subject | Object |
|---|---|
| Cambridge Platonism | God acts according to wisdom and goodness, not arbitrary will ⓘ |
| Neostoicism | God as providential ruler of the world via predicate surface "viewsOnGod" ⓘ |
| Metrodorus of Lampsacus (the elder) | identified Homeric gods with natural elements via predicate surface "viewOnGods" ⓘ |
| Metrodorus of Lampsacus (the elder) | treated traditional gods as symbolic representations via predicate surface "viewOnGods" ⓘ |
| Atharism | affirms what God affirmed for Himself in revelation via predicate surface "viewOnGodsNature" ⓘ |
| Homoiousian theology | the Father is the source and cause of the Son via predicate surface "viewOnFather" ⓘ |
| Abu Mansur al-Maturidi | affirmed divine attributes without anthropomorphism via predicate surface "viewOnAttributesOfGod" ⓘ |
| Abu Mansur al-Maturidi | rejected corporealism regarding God via predicate surface "viewOnAttributesOfGod" ⓘ |
| Ajivika tradition | impersonal cosmic principle rather than personal deity ⓘ |
| Smarta Sampradaya | Ishvara is a personal manifestation of impersonal Brahman NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Shankara | nirguna Brahman is ultimate reality via predicate surface "viewOnBrahman" ⓘ |
| I–Thou relationship | God as the eternal Thou ⓘ |
| Haeckel's monism | rejects a personal transcendent God ⓘ |
| Bhaskara’s Bhedabheda | ultimate reality via predicate surface "viewsBrahmanAs" ⓘ |
| Spanish Kabbalah | distinction between Ein Sof and sefirot ⓘ |
| Radha-vallabha Sampradaya | God experienced primarily as beloved ⓘ |
| Bhāskara | Brahman is the material and efficient cause of the world via predicate surface "viewOnBrahman" NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Haridasa movement | Vishnu as supreme and distinct from souls ⓘ |
|
Warkari sampradaya
surface form:
Warkari Sampradaya
|
personal, loving deity accessible to all ⓘ |
| Protap Chunder Mozoomdar | affirmed a single, personal, ethical God ⓘ |
| Neo-Vaishnavism | personal God as supreme ⓘ |
| Brahma Sampradaya | supreme independent reality (svatantra) via predicate surface "considersGod" ⓘ |
| Likeness to God | God as moral and spiritual ideal ⓘ |
| Jahmiyya | God is absolutely transcendent and unlike creation ⓘ |
| Jahmiyya | God cannot be described by positive attributes distinct from His essence ⓘ |
| Tenrikyo | single parental deity ⓘ |
| Seicho-no-Ie | God as universal life ⓘ |
| Athari | acceptsQuranicAndPropheticDescriptionsWithoutAllegoricalInterpretation via predicate surface "viewOnAttributesOfGod" ⓘ |
| Athari | bilā kayf via predicate surface "viewOnAttributesOfGod" ⓘ |
| John H. Dietrich | non-theistic or naturalistic concept of divinity ⓘ |
| Servetian theology | emphasizes unity and singularity of God ⓘ |
| Ghost of Darius I | gods punish excessive pride via predicate surface "expressesViewOnGods" ⓘ |
| Abū al-Hudhayl al-ʿAllāf | God obligated by His justice to do what is best for creatures ⓘ |
| Good Men | belief in two opposing principles ⓘ |