heldByCourt

P50765
predicate

Indicates that a particular legal position, opinion, or decision is asserted or determined by a court.

Try in SPARQL

All labels observed (5)

Label Occurrences
heldByCourt canonical 6
holdingRelatedToHerCase 2
caseHeWasInHoldingSummary 1

Description generation (PDg)

The one-sentence description above was generated by prompting gpt-5.1 with the predicate name and this instruction.

Instruction
Given a predicate that represents a relationship or action between entities, generate a one-sentence description explaining its meaning.  
# Instructions
Focus on describing the relationship, not the entities themselves. 
# Response Format
Begin the description with \' Indicates...\'
Input
Predicate: heldByCourt
Generated description
Indicates that a particular legal position, opinion, or decision is asserted or determined by a court.

Sample triples (11)

Subject Object
Gebhart v. Belton segregated schools for Black students in Delaware were inferior to white schools ⓘ
Gebhart v. Belton segregated public schools violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ
Carol Anne Bond individuals have standing to raise Tenth Amendment challenges to federal statutes via predicate surface "holdingRelatedToHerCase" ⓘ
Carol Anne Bond Chemical Weapons Convention Implementation Act of 1998 via predicate surface "holdingRelatedToHerCase" ⓘ
surface form: the Chemical Weapons Convention Implementation Act did not reach her local assaultive conduct as a matter of statutory interpretation
The First Amendment did not bar prosecution of the defendant's antiwar publications under the circumstances of the case.
surface form: The First Amendment did not bar prosecution of the defendant's antiwar publications under the circumstances of the case
Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
Trial of General Tomoyuki Yamashita writ denied via predicate surface "decisionOnHabeasCorpus" ⓘ
Colorado Amendment 2 violates the Equal Protection Clause Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act’s provisions prohibiting state authorization of sports gambling schemes violate the anti-commandeering rule of the Tenth Amendment.
surface form: The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act’s provisions prohibiting state authorization of sports gambling schemes violate the anti-commandeering rule of the Tenth Amendment
Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
legal case State of New Jersey v. Rubin Carter
surface form: State of New Jersey v. Rubin Carter
convictions vacated via predicate surface "federalCourtHolding" ⓘ
Michael James Elstad a suspect’s voluntary post-Miranda confession is not automatically inadmissible solely because it follows an earlier unwarned but voluntary statement via predicate surface "caseHeWasInHoldingSummary" ⓘ
Texas remained a state in the Union despite its attempted secession U.S. Supreme Court NERFINISHED ⓘ