developedInCase
P17594
predicate
Indicates that something (such as a method, argument, or principle) was formulated, articulated, or established within the context of a particular case.
All labels observed (3)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| developedInCase canonical | 5 |
| formulatedInCase | 1 |
| furtherDevelopedInCase | 1 |
Description generation (PDg)
The one-sentence description above was generated by prompting gpt-5.1 with the predicate name and this instruction.
Instruction
Given a predicate that represents a relationship or action between entities, generate a one-sentence description explaining its meaning. # Instructions Focus on describing the relationship, not the entities themselves. # Response Format Begin the description with \' Indicates...\'
Input
Predicate: developedInCase
Generated description
Indicates that something (such as a method, argument, or principle) was formulated, articulated, or established within the context of a particular case.
Sample triples (7)
| Subject | Object |
|---|---|
| substantial effects doctrine | NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. ⓘ |
| substantial effects doctrine | Wickard v. Filburn ⓘ |
| clear and present danger test | Schenck v. United States ⓘ |
| political question doctrine | Marbury v. Madison ⓘ |
| political question doctrine | Luther v. Borden ⓘ |
| rule of reason | Chicago Board of Trade v. United States via predicate surface "furtherDevelopedInCase" NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Lotus principle | S.S. Lotus (France v. Turkey) via predicate surface "formulatedInCase" NERFINISHED ⓘ |