Cooley doctrine
E938883
The Cooley doctrine is a constitutional principle derived from the Supreme Court’s decision in Cooley v. Board of Wardens that allows states to regulate aspects of interstate commerce that are local in nature and do not require uniform national rules.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Cooley doctrine canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T11647694 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cooley doctrine Context triple: [Cooley v. Board of Wardens, hasDoctrine, Cooley doctrine]
-
A.
Powell Amendment
The Powell Amendment was a legislative proposal introduced by Congressman Adam Clayton Powell Jr. to deny federal funds to institutions that practiced racial discrimination, becoming a key tool in the fight for civil rights in mid-20th-century America.
-
B.
Hallstein Doctrine
The Hallstein Doctrine was a Cold War-era West German foreign policy that refused diplomatic relations with any country (except the USSR) that recognized East Germany as a sovereign state.
-
C.
Powell Doctrine
The Powell Doctrine is a U.S. military strategy principle advocating the use of overwhelming force, clear objectives, and strong public and international support before engaging in military action.
-
D.
Boland Amendment
The Boland Amendment was a series of U.S. legislative provisions in the early 1980s that restricted American government support for the Contra rebels in Nicaragua, setting the legal backdrop for the Iran–Contra affair.
-
E.
Eisenhower Doctrine
The Eisenhower Doctrine was a U.S. Cold War policy announced in 1957 that pledged American economic and military assistance to Middle Eastern countries resisting armed aggression or communist influence.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cooley doctrine Target entity description: The Cooley doctrine is a constitutional principle derived from the Supreme Court’s decision in Cooley v. Board of Wardens that allows states to regulate aspects of interstate commerce that are local in nature and do not require uniform national rules.
-
A.
Powell Amendment
The Powell Amendment was a legislative proposal introduced by Congressman Adam Clayton Powell Jr. to deny federal funds to institutions that practiced racial discrimination, becoming a key tool in the fight for civil rights in mid-20th-century America.
-
B.
Hallstein Doctrine
The Hallstein Doctrine was a Cold War-era West German foreign policy that refused diplomatic relations with any country (except the USSR) that recognized East Germany as a sovereign state.
-
C.
Powell Doctrine
The Powell Doctrine is a U.S. military strategy principle advocating the use of overwhelming force, clear objectives, and strong public and international support before engaging in military action.
-
D.
Boland Amendment
The Boland Amendment was a series of U.S. legislative provisions in the early 1980s that restricted American government support for the Contra rebels in Nicaragua, setting the legal backdrop for the Iran–Contra affair.
-
E.
Eisenhower Doctrine
The Eisenhower Doctrine was a U.S. Cold War policy announced in 1957 that pledged American economic and military assistance to Middle Eastern countries resisting armed aggression or communist influence.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (47)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States constitutional law concept
ⓘ
constitutional doctrine ⓘ legal doctrine ⓘ |
| addresses |
concurrent state and federal power over commerce
ⓘ
scope of exclusive federal power over interstate commerce ⓘ |
| allows | state regulation of local aspects of interstate commerce ⓘ |
| appliedTo |
other local maritime regulations
ⓘ
state pilotage laws ⓘ state port regulations ⓘ |
| appliesTo |
interstate commerce
ⓘ
state regulation of commerce ⓘ |
| basedOn | Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| category |
Commerce Clause doctrines
ⓘ
United States constitutional doctrines ⓘ federalism doctrines ⓘ |
| conditionForStateRegulation |
state regulation does not conflict with federal law
ⓘ
state regulation does not unduly burden interstate commerce ⓘ subject matter does not require a single uniform national rule ⓘ |
| constitutionalBasis | Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| contrastsWith | view that Congress has exclusive power over all interstate commerce ⓘ |
| corePrinciple |
other aspects of interstate commerce are local in nature and may be regulated by states
ⓘ
some aspects of interstate commerce require national uniform regulation ⓘ the need for national uniformity determines whether Congress has exclusive power over a subject of commerce ⓘ |
| courtCaseCitation | 53 U.S. (12 How.) 299 (1852) ⓘ |
| derivedFrom | Cooley v. Board of Wardens NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| formulatedBy | Supreme Court of the United States NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| hasInterpretation |
Congress has exclusive authority over subjects of commerce that demand national uniformity
ⓘ
states may regulate subjects of commerce that are local and diverse in character ⓘ |
| historicalSignificance |
early articulation of a balancing approach to commerce regulation
ⓘ
helped define boundary between national and local regulatory authority ⓘ |
| influenced | development of dormant Commerce Clause jurisprudence ⓘ |
| influencedBy | Cooley v. Board of Wardens holding that pilotage laws could be regulated by states NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| interpretiveApproach | subject-by-subject analysis of commerce powers ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | United States federal constitutional law NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| legalSystem | United States NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| limits | scope of implied exclusivity of the Commerce Clause ⓘ |
| namedAfter | Thomas M. Cooley NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| namedAfterCase | Cooley v. Board of Wardens NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| recognizes | concurrent state and federal authority over certain commercial subjects ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
division of powers between federal and state governments
ⓘ
dormant Commerce Clause NERFINISHED ⓘ federalism in the United States ⓘ |
| sourceCourtOpinionBy | Justice Benjamin R. Curtis NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| supports | presumption of state authority over local matters ⓘ |
| usedIn |
cases evaluating validity of state laws affecting interstate trade
ⓘ
judicial analysis of state economic regulation ⓘ |
| yearFormulated | 1852 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Cooley doctrine Description of subject: The Cooley doctrine is a constitutional principle derived from the Supreme Court’s decision in Cooley v. Board of Wardens that allows states to regulate aspects of interstate commerce that are local in nature and do not require uniform national rules.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.