Triple
T37694271
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cooley doctrine |
E938883
|
entity |
| Predicate | sourceCourtOpinionBy |
P4420
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Justice Benjamin R. Curtis |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Justice Benjamin R. Curtis | Statement: [Cooley doctrine, sourceCourtOpinionBy, Justice Benjamin R. Curtis]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sourceCourtOpinionBy Context triple: [Cooley doctrine, sourceCourtOpinionBy, Justice Benjamin R. Curtis]
-
A.
lawsuitRelatedSupremeCourtHolding
Indicates that the lawsuit is connected to, influenced by, or governed by a specific holding or decision of the Supreme Court.
-
B.
legalCitation
chosen
Indicates that one legal document, case, or authority formally references or cites another as a source of legal support or precedent.
-
C.
supremeCourtHolding
Indicates that a decision or legal principle has been formally established by a supreme court as the authoritative resolution of a legal issue.
-
D.
legalPrecedentFrom
Indicates that a legal decision, ruling, or principle is derived from, based on, or justified by an earlier legal case or authority.
-
E.
legalCitationSystem
Indicates a system or convention used to reference and identify legal authorities such as cases, statutes, or regulations.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76eda6ae48190b3111071eeacc038 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcda3699948190adb57625bae08091 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcd8fd16d08190b0aca6e19a632e99 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:25 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:18 p.m.