Frank v. Mangum

E934446

Frank v. Mangum is a 1915 U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing whether mob-dominated criminal trials violate due process under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Fourteenth Amendment case
United States Supreme Court case
criminal procedure case
areaOfLaw constitutional law
criminal law
federal courts
habeas corpus
citation 237 U.S. 309
constitutionalProvision Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment NERFINISHED
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1915-04-19
decisionType reported decision
dissentingOpinionBy Justice Charles Evans Hughes NERFINISHED
Justice Joseph R. Lamar NERFINISHED
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. NERFINISHED
Justice Willis Van Devanter NERFINISHED
fullCaseName Leo M. Frank v. C. A. Mangum, Sheriff, et al. NERFINISHED
holding A state criminal conviction obtained in a trial allegedly influenced by mob domination does not necessarily violate the Fourteenth Amendment if the state provides corrective judicial processes.
Federal courts on habeas corpus generally may not reexamine state court findings where the state has afforded corrective judicial process.
involvedPerson Charles Evans Hughes NERFINISHED
Joseph R. Lamar NERFINISHED
Leo Frank NERFINISHED
Mahlon Pitney NERFINISHED
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. NERFINISHED
Willis Van Devanter NERFINISHED
jurisdiction federal question jurisdiction
language English
legalIssue due process under the Fourteenth Amendment
federal habeas corpus review of state convictions
mob domination of criminal trials
majorityOpinionBy Justice Mahlon Pitney NERFINISHED
originatingCourt Supreme Court of Georgia NERFINISHED
pageInUnitedStatesReports 309
petitioner Leo M. Frank NERFINISHED
proceduralPosture appeal from denial of federal habeas corpus relief
publication United States Reports NERFINISHED
relatedCase Brown v. Mississippi NERFINISHED
Moore v. Dempsey NERFINISHED
Powell v. Alabama NERFINISHED
respondent C. A. Mangum NERFINISHED
subjectMatter state criminal conviction for murder
subsequentTreatment partially limited by Moore v. Dempsey, 261 U.S. 86 (1923)
topic mob influence on judicial proceedings
scope of federal habeas review of state convictions
volumeInUnitedStatesReports 237
yearDecided 1915

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.