Michigan v. Doran

E902469

Michigan v. Doran is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the limited role of asylum states in reviewing extradition requests from other states under the Extradition Clause and federal statute.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (45)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
criminal procedure case
extradition case
appliesTo governors of asylum states
state courts reviewing extradition warrants
areaOfLaw constitutional law
criminal law
intergovernmental relations
citation 439 U.S. 282
clarifies limited role of asylum states in extradition
construes federal extradition statute
defines scope of habeas corpus review in interstate extradition cases
establishesTest four-factor test for judicial review of extradition
frequentlyCitedFor limits on asylum state inquiry into probable cause
standard of review in interstate extradition
hasCountry United States of America
surface form: United States
hasCourt Supreme Court of the United States NERFINISHED
hasDecisionDate 1978
hasJurisdiction United States federal law NERFINISHED
hasLanguageOn comity among states in criminal law enforcement
hasPetitioner State of Michigan NERFINISHED
hasPrecedentialStatus binding precedent in U.S. federal and state courts on extradition issues
hasRespondent Doran NERFINISHED
holds asylum state courts may not re-litigate probable cause determinations of demanding states in extradition proceedings
asylum state may not consider defenses to the underlying charge in extradition proceedings
asylum state may not inquire into the guilt or innocence of the accused in extradition
extradition is a summary and mandatory executive proceeding
once the governor of the asylum state has granted extradition, judicial review is extremely limited
interprets 18 U.S.C. § 3182
Article IV, Section 2, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
Extradition Clause of the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
legalSubject criminal procedure
extradition
federalism
interstate rendition
limits asylum state power to deny extradition
pageInUnitedStatesReports 282
reinforces obligatory nature of interstate extradition under the Extradition Clause
relatedTo Extradition Clause jurisprudence
Kentucky v. Dennison NERFINISHED
Puerto Rico v. Branstad NERFINISHED
standsFor demanding state’s judicial determination of probable cause is binding on asylum state in extradition
extradition proceedings are not vehicles for full evidentiary hearings on the charge
volumeOfUnitedStatesReports 439
yearDecided 1978

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Puerto Rico v. Branstad relatedCase Michigan v. Doran