Juror 4
E838279
Juror 4 is the calm, analytical, and methodical juror in "12 Angry Men," known for his logical approach and reliance on facts over emotion during the jury's deliberations.
Statements (47)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
fictional character
ⓘ
juror ⓘ |
| appearsIn | 12 Angry Men NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| appearsInWorkType |
film
ⓘ
play ⓘ television film ⓘ |
| characterTrait |
analytical
ⓘ
calm ⓘ fact‑oriented ⓘ logical ⓘ methodical ⓘ rational ⓘ self‑controlled ⓘ |
| conflictWith | more emotional jurors ⓘ |
| contrastsWith | emotional reasoning ⓘ |
| createdBy | Reginald Rose NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| decisionCriterion | absence of reasonable doubt ⓘ |
| deliberatesOn | guilt or innocence of the defendant ⓘ |
| dressStyle | neatly dressed ⓘ |
| eventuallyAgreesWith | Juror 8 NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| firstAppearance | 1954 television play 12 Angry Men NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| gender | male ⓘ |
| initialVote | guilty ⓘ |
| interactsWith | Juror 8 NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| jurorNumber | 4 ⓘ |
| juryType | homicide trial jury ⓘ |
| laterVote | not guilty ⓘ |
| mediumOfOrigin | television play ⓘ |
| narrativeFunction |
embodies faith in the legal system’s rational process
ⓘ
tests the strength of Juror 8’s arguments ⓘ |
| nationalityInStory | American ⓘ |
| oftenOpposes | Juror 8 at the beginning of deliberations ⓘ |
| portrayedBy |
E. G. Marshall in the 1957 film 12 Angry Men
ⓘ
Robert Webber in the 1997 television film 12 Angry Men ⓘ |
| profession | stockbroker ⓘ |
| reasonForChangeOfVote |
reasonable doubt about eyewitness testimony
ⓘ
reasonable doubt about reliability of evidence ⓘ |
| reliesOn |
facts
ⓘ
logic ⓘ |
| roleInPlot |
skeptical evaluator of evidence
ⓘ
voice of reason in deliberations ⓘ |
| settingOfActions | New York City courthouse jury room NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| socialClass | middle‑class ⓘ |
| speechStyle | precise ⓘ |
| symbolizes |
empiricism
ⓘ
objective analysis ⓘ rationalism ⓘ |
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.