Triple
T32778292
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Juror 4 |
E838279
|
entity |
| Predicate | eventuallyAgreesWith |
P180119
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Juror 8 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Juror 8 | Statement: [Juror 4, eventuallyAgreesWith, Juror 8]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: eventuallyAgreesWith Context triple: [Juror 4, eventuallyAgreesWith, Juror 8]
-
A.
agreedOn
Indicates that two or more parties have reached a mutual agreement or consensus regarding a specific matter, decision, or proposal.
-
B.
eventuallyIn
Indicates that one entity will, at some later time or in the long run, come to be located in, belong to, or be contained within another entity or state.
-
C.
laterConsensus
chosen
Indicates that a consensus or agreed-upon position is reached at a time later than a previously considered or initial consensus.
-
D.
initiallyAgreedBy
Indicates that an agreement, decision, or arrangement was first accepted or consented to by a particular party or set of parties.
-
E.
confirmedAgreementBetween
Indicates that a previously proposed agreement between two or more parties has been formally verified, accepted, and is now recognized as valid.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3493a824c8190938489ba69041d08 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f73ae120bc8190bff94d38d7a7a00d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:09 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f73a38d0848190aa5139144b8561c6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:06 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:13 a.m.