Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd

E728348

Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd is a landmark 2004 House of Lords decision in English law that developed the modern tort of misuse of private information and clarified the balance between privacy rights and freedom of expression.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (47)

Predicate Object
instanceOf English tort law case
House of Lords decision
UK privacy law case
human rights law case
misuse of private information case
areaOfLaw human rights law
media law
privacy law
tort law
citation [2004] 2 AC 457
[2004] 2 All ER 995
[2004] 2 WLR 1232
[2004] UKHL 22
claimant Naomi Campbell NERFINISHED
conventionRightInvolved Article 10 European Convention on Human Rights NERFINISHED
Article 8 European Convention on Human Rights NERFINISHED
country United Kingdom
court House of Lords NERFINISHED
defendant Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd NERFINISHED
developed modern tort of misuse of private information in English law
fullCaseName Naomi Campbell v MGN Limited NERFINISHED
held Naomi Campbell’s Article 8 rights outweighed the newspaper’s Article 10 rights on the specific facts
publication of certain details of Naomi Campbell’s drug treatment was a misuse of private information
influenced Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd NERFINISHED
Murray v Express Newspapers plc NERFINISHED
PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd NERFINISHED
subsequent UK privacy law jurisprudence
jurisdiction England and Wales
legalIssue breach of confidence
freedom of expression
misuse of private information
right to respect for private life
legalTest two-stage test: reasonable expectation of privacy and balancing of competing rights
lowerCourt Court of Appeal of England and Wales NERFINISHED
originatingCourt High Court of Justice NERFINISHED
outcomeForClaimant Naomi Campbell succeeded in the House of Lords NERFINISHED
panel Appellate Committee of the House of Lords NERFINISHED
ratioDecidendi a person may have a reasonable expectation of privacy in medical and treatment information
courts must balance competing rights to privacy and freedom of expression
misuse of private information is a distinct cause of action derived from breach of confidence
significance clarified balancing exercise between Articles 8 and 10 ECHR
clarified test for reasonable expectation of privacy
landmark case on privacy and media intrusion
statutoryContext Human Rights Act 1998 NERFINISHED
subjectMatter publication of detailed information about Naomi Campbell’s drug addiction treatment
publication of photographs of Naomi Campbell leaving a Narcotics Anonymous meeting
yearDecided 2004

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead notableWork Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd