White v White
E728347
White v White is a landmark 2000 House of Lords decision that reshaped English divorce law by establishing the “yardstick of equality” as the starting point for dividing matrimonial assets.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| White v White canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T8338875 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: White v White Context triple: [Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, notableWork, White v White]
-
A.
White on White
White on White is a seminal abstract painting by Kazimir Malevich that exemplifies Suprematism through its nearly monochromatic composition of a white square on a slightly different white background.
-
B.
The White-Blues
The White-Blues is the traditional nickname of FC Dynamo Kyiv, one of Ukraine’s most successful and historically significant football clubs.
-
C.
The White and Blues
The White and Blues is the nickname of KF Tirana, one of Albania’s most successful and historically significant football clubs.
-
D.
The Black and Whites
The Black and Whites is the traditional nickname of Hull F.C., a professional rugby league club based in Kingston upon Hull, England.
-
E.
The White One
The White One is an epithet of Nekhbet, the ancient Egyptian vulture goddess who served as a protector of Upper Egypt and the pharaoh.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: White v White Target entity description: White v White is a landmark 2000 House of Lords decision that reshaped English divorce law by establishing the “yardstick of equality” as the starting point for dividing matrimonial assets.
-
A.
White on White
White on White is a seminal abstract painting by Kazimir Malevich that exemplifies Suprematism through its nearly monochromatic composition of a white square on a slightly different white background.
-
B.
The White-Blues
The White-Blues is the traditional nickname of FC Dynamo Kyiv, one of Ukraine’s most successful and historically significant football clubs.
-
C.
The White and Blues
The White and Blues is the nickname of KF Tirana, one of Albania’s most successful and historically significant football clubs.
-
D.
The Black and Whites
The Black and Whites is the traditional nickname of Hull F.C., a professional rugby league club based in Kingston upon Hull, England.
-
E.
The White One
The White One is an epithet of Nekhbet, the ancient Egyptian vulture goddess who served as a protector of Upper Egypt and the pharaoh.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (46)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
House of Lords decision
ⓘ
United Kingdom case law ⓘ landmark family law case ⓘ |
| appliesTo |
ancillary relief proceedings
ⓘ
financial remedy proceedings on divorce ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
divorce law
ⓘ
family law ⓘ |
| citation |
[2000] 2 FLR 981
ⓘ
[2000] 3 WLR 1571 ⓘ [2000] UKHL 54 ⓘ [2001] 1 AC 596 ⓘ |
| country | United Kingdom ⓘ |
| court | House of Lords NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 2000 ⓘ |
| emphasised |
fairness as the overarching objective in ancillary relief
ⓘ
non-discrimination between breadwinner and homemaker ⓘ |
| holding |
departures from equality must be justified
ⓘ
equality should be the starting point in division of matrimonial assets ⓘ there should be no bias in favour of the money-earner over the homemaker ⓘ |
| influenced |
approach to big money divorce cases in England and Wales
ⓘ
subsequent English divorce settlements practice ⓘ |
| involvedConcept |
fairness in ancillary relief
ⓘ
matrimonial assets ⓘ non-matrimonial assets ⓘ |
| isLandmarkFor | modern approach to financial provision on divorce in England and Wales ⓘ |
| judge |
Lord Clyde
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Lord Hoffmann NERFINISHED ⓘ Lord Hutton NERFINISHED ⓘ Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead NERFINISHED ⓘ Lord Steyn NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | England and Wales ⓘ |
| keyPhrase | yardstick of equality of division ⓘ |
| language | English ⓘ |
| legalPrinciple | yardstick of equality ⓘ |
| legalSystem | common law ⓘ |
| originatedFrom | Court of Appeal of England and Wales NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| overturnedOrModified | previous practice of needs-based only approach in high-asset cases ⓘ |
| parties |
Mr White
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Mrs White NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| precedentFor |
McFarlane v McFarlane
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Miller v Miller NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| statutoryContext | Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
division of matrimonial property
ⓘ
financial provision on divorce ⓘ |
| topic |
principles for ancillary relief under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
ⓘ
redistribution of assets between spouses ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: White v White Description of subject: White v White is a landmark 2000 House of Lords decision that reshaped English divorce law by establishing the “yardstick of equality” as the starting point for dividing matrimonial assets.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.