R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul

E675188

R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul is a landmark 1992 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a local hate-speech ordinance as unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination under the First Amendment.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (47)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
landmark decision
areaOfLaw constitutional law
freedom of expression law
arguedDate 1991-12-04
citation 505 U.S. 377
concurrenceBy Byron R. White NERFINISHED
Harry A. Blackmun NERFINISHED
John Paul Stevens NERFINISHED
Sandra Day O’Connor NERFINISHED
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted First Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1992-06-22
decisionType unanimous judgment with multiple concurrences
docketNumber 90-7675
fullName R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, Minnesota NERFINISHED
holding Government may not engage in viewpoint discrimination within a proscribable category of speech
The St. Paul Bias-Motivated Crime Ordinance is facially unconstitutional under the First Amendment
The ordinance impermissibly discriminated on the basis of content and viewpoint
impact clarified that even within unprotected categories of speech, the government cannot favor or disfavor particular viewpoints
limited the ability of governments to enact hate-speech ordinances
jurisdiction United States federal law
legalIssue First Amendment freedom of speech
content-based regulation of speech
fighting words doctrine
viewpoint discrimination
locationOfIncident St. Paul, Minnesota NERFINISHED
majorityOpinionBy Antonin Scalia NERFINISHED
majorityOpinionJoinedBy Anthony M. Kennedy NERFINISHED
Byron R. White NERFINISHED
Clarence Thomas NERFINISHED
David H. Souter NERFINISHED
John Paul Stevens NERFINISHED
Sandra Day O’Connor NERFINISHED
William H. Rehnquist NERFINISHED
originatingCourt Minnesota courts
page 377
petitioner R.A.V. NERFINISHED
reporter United States Reports
respondent City of St. Paul, Minnesota NERFINISHED
topic bias-motivated crime ordinance
cross burning
hate speech regulation
symbolic speech
volume 505
yearDecided 1992

Referenced by (2)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Virginia v. Black relatedTo R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire precedentFor R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul