Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.

E666873

United States Supreme Court case antitrust case landmark case

Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. is a landmark 1961 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that established the Noerr-Pennington doctrine, which shields efforts to petition the government from liability under the antitrust laws.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (43)

Predicate	Object
instanceOf	United States Supreme Court case ⓘ antitrust case ⓘ landmark case ⓘ
alsoKnownAs	Noerr NERFINISHED ⓘ
appliesTo	lobbying of legislative bodies ⓘ petitioning of executive officials ⓘ
category	United States Supreme Court cases in antitrust law ⓘ United States Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court ⓘ
citation	365 U.S. 127 ⓘ 5 L. Ed. 2d 464 ⓘ 81 S. Ct. 523 ⓘ
constitutionalBasis	First Amendment right to petition the government ⓘ
country	United States of America ⓘ surface form: United States
courtTerm	1960 Term of the U.S. Supreme Court ⓘ
createsException	sham exception to Noerr-Pennington immunity (later developed in subsequent cases) ⓘ
decidedBy	Supreme Court of the United States NERFINISHED ⓘ
decisionDate	1961 ⓘ
defendant	Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference NERFINISHED ⓘ
doctrineEstablished	Noerr-Pennington doctrine NERFINISHED ⓘ
holds	efforts to influence legislative or executive action are not subject to Sherman Act liability, even if anticompetitive in purpose or effect ⓘ petitioning the government is generally immune from antitrust liability ⓘ
impact	limits application of antitrust laws to political activity ⓘ protects lobbying campaigns from antitrust liability in most circumstances ⓘ
involvesStatute	Sherman Antitrust Act NERFINISHED ⓘ
issue	whether a publicity campaign to influence legislation could violate the Sherman Act ⓘ
jurisdiction	federal ⓘ
laterClarifiedBy	California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited NERFINISHED ⓘ United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington NERFINISHED ⓘ
legalArea	antitrust law ⓘ competition law ⓘ constitutional law ⓘ
plaintiff	Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. NERFINISHED ⓘ
reasoning	a construction of the Sherman Act that impairs the right to petition would raise serious constitutional problems ⓘ antitrust laws are directed against business competition, not political activity ⓘ
relatedConcept	lobbying ⓘ right to petition ⓘ sham litigation doctrine NERFINISHED ⓘ
relatedDoctrine	Noerr-Pennington immunity ⓘ
result	reversal of lower court judgment against the railroads ⓘ
subjectMatter	competition between railroads and motor carriers ⓘ railroad industry publicity campaign against trucking companies ⓘ
usedAsPrecedentIn	cases involving lobbying immunity ⓘ cases involving petitioning of courts and agencies under Noerr-Pennington ⓘ

Referenced by (2)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited → relatedCase → Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. ⓘ

Noerr-Pennington doctrine → originatedInCase → Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. ⓘ