Dirk De Jonge was convicted for speaking at a peaceful public meeting held under the auspices of the Communist Party in Portland, Oregon
E666850
De Jonge v. Oregon is a landmark 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that held states cannot criminalize peaceful assembly and political association, reinforcing First Amendment protections through the Fourteenth Amendment.
All labels observed (1)
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T7476001 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: Dirk De Jonge was convicted for speaking at a peaceful public meeting held under the auspices of the Communist Party in Portland, Oregon Context triple: [De Jonge v. Oregon, factualBackground, Dirk De Jonge was convicted for speaking at a peaceful public meeting held under the auspices of the Communist Party in Portland, Oregon]
-
A.
Ohio Criminal Syndicalism Act
The Ohio Criminal Syndicalism Act was a state law that criminalized advocacy of violence or unlawful methods of political change, later deemed unconstitutional in the landmark free speech case Brandenburg v. Ohio.
-
B.
Marie Gitlow
Marie Gitlow was the wife of American socialist politician and activist Benjamin Gitlow.
-
C.
Chicago Eight trial
The Chicago Eight trial was a high-profile 1969–1970 U.S. federal court case in which anti–Vietnam War activists were prosecuted for conspiracy and inciting riots related to protests at the 1968 Democratic National Convention.
-
D.
Debs v. United States
Debs v. United States was a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case in which socialist leader Eugene V. Debs’s conviction for antiwar speech was upheld, reinforcing broad limits on free speech during wartime.
-
E.
Gitlow v. New York
Gitlow v. New York is a 1925 U.S. Supreme Court case that marked a major step in applying First Amendment free speech protections to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: Dirk De Jonge was convicted for speaking at a peaceful public meeting held under the auspices of the Communist Party in Portland, Oregon Target entity description: De Jonge v. Oregon is a landmark 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that held states cannot criminalize peaceful assembly and political association, reinforcing First Amendment protections through the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
A.
Ohio Criminal Syndicalism Act
The Ohio Criminal Syndicalism Act was a state law that criminalized advocacy of violence or unlawful methods of political change, later deemed unconstitutional in the landmark free speech case Brandenburg v. Ohio.
-
B.
Marie Gitlow
Marie Gitlow was the wife of American socialist politician and activist Benjamin Gitlow.
-
C.
Chicago Eight trial
The Chicago Eight trial was a high-profile 1969–1970 U.S. federal court case in which anti–Vietnam War activists were prosecuted for conspiracy and inciting riots related to protests at the 1968 Democratic National Convention.
-
D.
Debs v. United States
Debs v. United States was a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case in which socialist leader Eugene V. Debs’s conviction for antiwar speech was upheld, reinforcing broad limits on free speech during wartime.
-
E.
Gitlow v. New York
Gitlow v. New York is a 1925 U.S. Supreme Court case that marked a major step in applying First Amendment free speech protections to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (46)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
U.S. Supreme Court case
ⓘ
landmark First Amendment case ⓘ person ⓘ |
| activityLeadingToArrest | speaking at a peaceful public meeting in Portland, Oregon ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
First Amendment law
ⓘ
civil liberties ⓘ constitutional law ⓘ |
| citation | 299 U.S. 353 ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvision |
First Amendment to the United States Constitution
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| convictedUnder | Oregon criminal syndicalism statute NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| convictionStatusAfterAppeal | reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court in De Jonge v. Oregon ⓘ |
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1937-01-04 ⓘ |
| doctrine | First Amendment freedoms are fundamental and safeguarded by the Fourteenth Amendment from state infringement ⓘ |
| factPattern | Dirk De Jonge was arrested and convicted for speaking at a peaceful public meeting held under the auspices of the Communist Party in Portland, Oregon NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| fullName | Dirk De Jonge v. State of Oregon NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| historicalContext | Red Scare–era criminal syndicalism prosecutions ⓘ |
| holding |
Participation in a peaceful public meeting called by the Communist Party cannot be punished under a criminal syndicalism statute solely because of the party’s advocacy
ⓘ
States cannot criminalize peaceful assembly for lawful discussion, even if held under the auspices of a political party such as the Communist Party ⓘ The right of peaceable assembly is a fundamental right protected against state infringement by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ |
| jurisdiction |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| legalIssue |
freedom of assembly
ⓘ
freedom of speech ⓘ incorporation of the First Amendment ⓘ |
| locationOfEvents | Portland, Oregon NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| meetingOrganizer | Communist Party NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| opinionBy | Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| overturnedLaw | application of Oregon’s criminal syndicalism statute to peaceful assembly ⓘ |
| petitioner | Dirk De Jonge NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| precedentFor |
incorporation of freedom of assembly against the states
ⓘ
limits on state criminal syndicalism laws ⓘ protection of peaceful political meetings from state suppression ⓘ |
| relatedCase |
Gitlow v. New York
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Hague v. CIO NERFINISHED ⓘ Stromberg v. California NERFINISHED ⓘ Whitney v. California NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| relatedRight |
freedom of expression
ⓘ
right to peaceable assembly ⓘ right to political association ⓘ |
| respondent | State of Oregon NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| resultForPetitioner | conviction reversed ⓘ |
| roleInCase | petitioner in De Jonge v. Oregon ⓘ |
| stateInvolved | Oregon NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| vote | unanimous decision ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 1937 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: Dirk De Jonge was convicted for speaking at a peaceful public meeting held under the auspices of the Communist Party in Portland, Oregon Description of subject: De Jonge v. Oregon is a landmark 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that held states cannot criminalize peaceful assembly and political association, reinforcing First Amendment protections through the Fourteenth Amendment.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.