Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd
E655800
Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd is a leading UK House of Lords decision on contractual interpretation, particularly the admissibility of pre-contractual negotiations and the correction of obvious drafting mistakes.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T7296864 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd Context triple: [Lord Hoffmann, notableWork, Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd]
-
A.
D & C Builders Ltd v Rees
D & C Builders Ltd v Rees is a leading English contract law case, best known for Lord Denning’s judgment on economic duress and the enforceability of part-payment settlements.
-
B.
Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd
Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd is a landmark 1947 English contract law case in which Lord Denning articulated the modern doctrine of promissory estoppel.
-
C.
Thoburn v Sunderland City Council
Thoburn v Sunderland City Council is a landmark 2002 English administrative law case in which the High Court articulated the concept of "constitutional statutes" within the UK legal system.
-
D.
Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co (Contractors) Ltd
Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co (Contractors) Ltd is a leading English Court of Appeal case on negligence and pure economic loss, noted for Lord Denning’s influential judgment limiting recovery for relational economic loss.
-
E.
Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.
Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. is a landmark 1968 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that Congress may prohibit all racial discrimination, private as well as public, in the sale or rental of property under 42 U.S.C. § 1982.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd Target entity description: Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd is a leading UK House of Lords decision on contractual interpretation, particularly the admissibility of pre-contractual negotiations and the correction of obvious drafting mistakes.
-
A.
D & C Builders Ltd v Rees
D & C Builders Ltd v Rees is a leading English contract law case, best known for Lord Denning’s judgment on economic duress and the enforceability of part-payment settlements.
-
B.
Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd
Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd is a landmark 1947 English contract law case in which Lord Denning articulated the modern doctrine of promissory estoppel.
-
C.
Thoburn v Sunderland City Council
Thoburn v Sunderland City Council is a landmark 2002 English administrative law case in which the High Court articulated the concept of "constitutional statutes" within the UK legal system.
-
D.
Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co (Contractors) Ltd
Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co (Contractors) Ltd is a leading English Court of Appeal case on negligence and pure economic loss, noted for Lord Denning’s influential judgment limiting recovery for relational economic loss.
-
E.
Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.
Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. is a landmark 1968 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that Congress may prohibit all racial discrimination, private as well as public, in the sale or rental of property under 42 U.S.C. § 1982.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (47)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
House of Lords decision
ⓘ
UK case law decision ⓘ contract law case ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
commercial law
ⓘ
contract law ⓘ |
| citation |
[2009] 1 AC 1101
ⓘ
[2009] UKHL 38 ⓘ |
| claimant | Chartbrook Ltd NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| country | United Kingdom ⓘ |
| court | House of Lords NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| defendant | Persimmon Homes Ltd NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| followedBy |
Arnold v Britton
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank NERFINISHED ⓘ Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| holding |
appeal allowed in favour of Persimmon Homes Ltd
ⓘ
contract wording could be corrected to reflect parties' objective intention ⓘ evidence of pre-contractual negotiations remained inadmissible for interpretation ⓘ |
| influencedBy | Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| judge |
Baroness Hale of Richmond
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Lord Hoffmann NERFINISHED ⓘ Lord Hope of Craighead NERFINISHED ⓘ Lord Rodger of Earlsferry NERFINISHED ⓘ Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | United Kingdom ⓘ |
| language | English ⓘ |
| leadingJudge | Lord Hoffmann NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
admissibility of pre-contractual negotiations
ⓘ
contractual interpretation ⓘ correction of obvious drafting mistakes ⓘ |
| legalPrinciple |
courts may correct obvious drafting mistakes in contracts
ⓘ
distinction between interpretation and rectification ⓘ interpretation based on what a reasonable person with background knowledge would understand ⓘ objective approach to contractual interpretation ⓘ pre-contractual negotiations are generally inadmissible as an aid to construction ⓘ subsequent conduct is generally inadmissible for interpretation ⓘ |
| legalSystem | common law ⓘ |
| locationOfCourt | London NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| overrulesOrClarifies | Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society (clarified) NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| parties |
Chartbrook Ltd
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Persimmon Homes Ltd NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| precedentialStatus |
binding precedent in England and Wales
ⓘ
leading authority ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
calculation of additional residential payment
ⓘ
property development agreement ⓘ |
| topic |
construction of commercial contracts
ⓘ
use of background or matrix of fact ⓘ |
| yearOfDecision | 2009 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd Description of subject: Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd is a leading UK House of Lords decision on contractual interpretation, particularly the admissibility of pre-contractual negotiations and the correction of obvious drafting mistakes.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.