Re B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof)

E655795

Re B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof) is a leading House of Lords decision that clarified the civil standard of proof required in child care proceedings under UK law.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (39)

Predicate Object
instanceOf House of Lords decision
UK case law
public law children case
appliesTo Children Act 1989 care proceedings
public law applications for care orders
authorityLevel binding precedent in England and Wales
leading authority
citedBy UK family courts in care proceedings
citedFor approach to evaluating serious allegations in civil proceedings
statement of the civil standard of proof in child protection cases
clarified that the civil standard of proof applies in care proceedings
that the seriousness of the allegation does not change the standard of proof
that the seriousness of the allegation is relevant to the evaluation of evidence
that there is no intermediate standard of proof between civil and criminal standards
concerns care proceedings
standard of proof
country England and Wales NERFINISHED
court House of Lords NERFINISHED
holding local authorities must prove facts on the balance of probabilities
the so‑called ‘heightened civil standard’ is rejected
impact rejection of variable standards of proof based on gravity of allegations
standardised approach to proof in care proceedings
influenced later UK child protection jurisprudence
jurisdiction United Kingdom
keyIssue threshold criteria under section 31 of the Children Act 1989
whether allegations of serious harm require a higher standard of proof
language English
legalArea child protection law
evidence law
family law
legalPrinciple only two standards of proof exist in English law: civil and criminal
the balance of probabilities means ‘more likely than not’
the more serious the allegation, the stronger the evidence needed to satisfy the same standard
standardOfProof balance of probabilities
civil standard
subjectMatter risk of significant harm
welfare of children
usedIn practice of local authorities in child protection cases
training and guidance for family judges

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Lord Hoffmann notableWork Re B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof)