Tulk v Moxhay

E628502

Tulk v Moxhay is an 1848 English Court of Chancery decision that established the enforceability in equity of restrictive covenants against subsequent purchasers of land who have notice of them.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (44)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Court of Chancery decision
English court case
land law case
leading case
appliesTo restrictive covenants
successors in title
areaOfLaw equity
land law
property law
bindingOn subsequent purchasers with notice
category 1848 in case law
Court of Chancery cases
English property case
citationStatus leading authority on restrictive covenants
country England
United Kingdom
court Court of Chancery NERFINISHED
covenantType negative covenant
dateDecided 1848
decisionYear 1848
enforcedBy court of equity
established enforceability in equity of restrictive covenants against subsequent purchasers with notice
holding a purchaser of land with notice of a restrictive covenant will be restrained in equity from acting in breach of it
the burden of a restrictive covenant can run in equity to bind successors in title who take with notice
influenced development of the law of covenants running with land
equitable servitudes doctrine in common law jurisdictions
modern English land law
jurisdiction England and Wales
keyConcept burden of a covenant running in equity
notice in equity
restrictive covenant binding successors
language English
legalPrinciple restrictive covenants may be enforced in equity against subsequent purchasers with notice
legalSystem common law
notedFor distinguishing between legal and equitable enforcement of covenants
foundation of the modern doctrine of restrictive covenants in English law
party Moxhay NERFINISHED
Tulk NERFINISHED
remedy injunction
requires notice of the covenant
that the covenant be intended to benefit land retained by the covenantee
that the covenant be restrictive in nature
subjectMatter agreement to keep land as an open garden or square
use of land in Leicester Square, London

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Court of Chancery notableCase Tulk v Moxhay