William Malloy
E598178
William Malloy was the defendant whose challenge to a contempt conviction for refusing to incriminate himself led to the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision applying the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination to the states.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| William Malloy canonical | 1 |
Statements (29)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
criminal defendant ⓘ landmark decision ⓘ person ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
constitutional law
ⓘ
criminal procedure ⓘ |
| citation | 378 U.S. 1 ⓘ |
| constitutionalRightInvoked |
Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| countryOfCitizenship | United States of America ⓘ |
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1964 ⓘ |
| hasRole | petitioner in Malloy v. Hogan ⓘ |
| holding |
States may not compel a person to incriminate himself
ⓘ
The Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination is incorporated against the states through the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ |
| impact | helped apply the federal privilege against self-incrimination to the states ⓘ |
| jurisdiction |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| legalIssue |
contempt conviction
ⓘ
refusal to incriminate himself ⓘ |
| legalSubject |
Fifth Amendment
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Fourteenth Amendment NERFINISHED ⓘ privilege against self-incrimination ⓘ |
| notableFor | being the defendant in Malloy v. Hogan ⓘ |
| party |
State of Connecticut
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
William Malloy NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| placeOfLegalProceedings | Connecticut NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
Miranda v. Arizona
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
incorporation doctrine ⓘ |
| subjectOf | Malloy v. Hogan NERFINISHED ⓘ |
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.