Risk, Ambiguity and the Savage Axioms

E564105

"Risk, Ambiguity and the Savage Axioms" is a seminal 1961 paper by Daniel Ellsberg that challenges expected utility theory by demonstrating how people systematically prefer known risks over ambiguous ones, a phenomenon now known as the Ellsberg paradox.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (46)

Predicate Object
instanceOf academic paper
decision theory paper
economics paper
argues that people treat ambiguity differently from risk
that subjective probabilities may be indeterminate or interval-valued
author Daniel Ellsberg NERFINISHED
citedAs Ellsberg 1961
contribution challenged the descriptive validity of Savage’s expected utility axioms
highlighted systematic ambiguity aversion in human choices
introduced the Ellsberg paradox
provided experimental-style thought experiments on ambiguity
stimulated development of non-expected utility models
describes choices between bets with known probabilities and bets with unknown probabilities
thought experiments with urns containing balls of different colors
examines behavioral violations of normative axioms
preferences that cannot be represented by a single expected utility function
field behavioral economics
decision theory
economics
probability theory
hasParadox Ellsberg paradox NERFINISHED
influenced behavioral economics
models of multiple priors
non-additive probability models
prospect theory and related behavioral models
theory of ambiguity in decision making
language English
mainConcept Ellsberg paradox NERFINISHED
Savage axioms NERFINISHED
ambiguity aversion
decision under uncertainty
expected utility theory
subjective probability
publicationYear 1961
relatedTo Foundations of Statistics by Leonard J. Savage NERFINISHED
Knightian uncertainty
subjective expected utility theory
shows inconsistency with Savage’s subjective expected utility theory
systematic preference for known risks over ambiguous risks
violations of the sure-thing principle
status classic reference on ambiguity aversion
seminal work in decision theory
topic comparisons of risky and ambiguous lotteries
preference for known risks over ambiguous risks
subjective probabilities not representable by a single additive measure
violations of expected utility theory

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Daniel Ellsberg notableWork Risk, Ambiguity and the Savage Axioms