United States v. Washington

E551693

United States v. Washington is a landmark federal court case that affirmed and clarified Pacific Northwest Native American tribes’ treaty fishing rights, significantly shaping U.S. Indian law and natural resource management.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Indian law case
federal court case
fisheries law case
landmark case
affects state regulatory authority over fisheries
tribal sovereignty over natural resources
alsoKnownAs Boldt Decision NERFINISHED
appealTo United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit NERFINISHED
basedOn Stevens Treaties NERFINISHED
Treaty of Medicine Creek NERFINISHED
Treaty of Neah Bay NERFINISHED
Treaty of Point Elliott NERFINISHED
Treaty of Point No Point NERFINISHED
category United States District Court case for the Western District of Washington
United States Native American case law
United States environmental case law
citation 384 F. Supp. 312
clarified meaning of the phrase "in common with" in Stevens Treaties
scope of tribal co-management authority over fisheries
court United States District Court for the Western District of Washington NERFINISHED
decisionDate 1974-02-12
defendant State of Washington NERFINISHED
followedBy United States v. Washington (culverts subproceeding) NERFINISHED
subsequent enforcement and implementation subproceedings
geographicScope Pacific Northwest NERFINISHED
Washington State NERFINISHED
heldThat state regulation of treaty fishing must meet strict standards and cannot abrogate treaty rights
treaty fishing rights are reserved rights not granted rights
treaty tribes are entitled to up to 50 percent of harvestable fish in their usual and accustomed fishing grounds
impact significantly shaped U.S. Indian law
significantly shaped natural resource management in the Pacific Northwest
strengthened enforcement of Native American treaty rights
involves Pacific Northwest Native American tribes NERFINISHED
Washington State fisheries regulations
judge George Hugo Boldt NERFINISHED
jurisdiction United States federal courts NERFINISHED
legalArea Native American law
fisheries management
natural resources law
treaty rights
plaintiff United States of America NERFINISHED
recognized tribal rights to fish at usual and accustomed places
relatedCase Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Association NERFINISHED
resultedIn increased tribal participation in natural resource governance
major restructuring of fisheries management in Washington State
recognition of tribal co-management of fisheries with the State of Washington
subjectMatter treaty-secured off-reservation fishing rights
timePeriod 20th century

Referenced by (3)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Puyallup Tribe involvedIn United States v. Washington
Treaty of Point No Point relatedToCase United States v. Washington
Treaty of Neah Bay citedIn United States v. Washington