Triple

T22317760
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject United States v. Washington E551693 entity
Predicate followedBy P78 FINISHED
Object United States v. Washington (culverts subproceeding) — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. Washington (culverts subproceeding) | Statement: [United States v. Washington, followedBy, United States v. Washington (culverts subproceeding)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: United States v. Washington (culverts subproceeding)
Context triple: [United States v. Washington, followedBy, United States v. Washington (culverts subproceeding)]
  • A. United States v. Washington chosen
    United States v. Washington is a landmark federal court case that affirmed and clarified Pacific Northwest Native American tribes’ treaty fishing rights, significantly shaping U.S. Indian law and natural resource management.
  • B. Mountain Timber Co. v. Washington
    Mountain Timber Co. v. Washington is a 1917 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a state workers’ compensation law against due process and takings clause challenges, reinforcing broad state authority to regulate employer liability for workplace injuries.
  • C. Crawford v. Washington
    Crawford v. Washington is a landmark 2004 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reshaped Confrontation Clause jurisprudence by holding that testimonial hearsay is inadmissible against a criminal defendant unless the witness is unavailable and there was a prior opportunity for cross-examination.
  • D. Columbia River Treaty
    The Columbia River Treaty is a landmark 1964 agreement between the United States and Canada that coordinates hydropower generation and flood control in the Columbia River Basin.
  • E. Columbia River recreation corridor
    The Columbia River recreation corridor is a scenic stretch along the Columbia River known for its beaches, parks, and diverse opportunities for boating, fishing, camping, and other outdoor activities.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e4776588190abb21e5cea79973f completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f157543d688190a151fade71880131 completed April 29, 2026, 12:56 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:42 p.m.