Nostratic hypothesis

E394595

The Nostratic hypothesis is a controversial linguistic theory proposing that several major language families of Eurasia and sometimes beyond share a common ancestral proto-language.

All labels observed (2)

Label Occurrences
Nostratic hypothesis canonical 1
Proto-Nostratic 1

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf linguistic hypothesis
macrofamily proposal
aimsToExplain deep genetic relationships among major language families
basedOn lexical comparison
morphological parallels
phonological correspondences
characterizedAs controversial
long-range comparison hypothesis
coinedBy Holger Pedersen
criticizedBy many mainstream historical linguists
criticizedFor excessive time depth
insufficiently rigorous methodology
reliance on chance resemblances
currentConsensus not generally accepted as demonstrated
developedBy Aharon Dolgopolsky
Allan R. Bomhard NERFINISHED
Vitaly Shevoroshkin NERFINISHED
Vladislav Illich-Svitych NERFINISHED
documentationLanguage English (later work)
Russian (early Soviet-era work)
field comparative linguistics
historical linguistics
geographicScope Eurasia
parts of North Africa (via Afroasiatic)
sometimes North America (via Eskimo–Aleut)
hasSubgroupingVariant Eurasiatic as a branch of Nostratic (in some models)
includesLanguageFamily Afroasiatic (in many formulations)
Altaic (in some formulations)
Chukotko-Kamchatkan (in some formulations)
Dravidian languages
surface form: Dravidian (in some formulations)

Eskimo–Aleut (in some formulations)
Indo-European language family
surface form: Indo-European

Kartvelian
Uralic languages
surface form: Uralic
influencedBy earlier ideas of language macrofamilies
opposedBy strict Neogrammarian comparative method standards
originatedBy Holger Pedersen
proposedProtoLanguage Nostratic hypothesis self-linksurface differs
surface form: Proto-Nostratic
proposes existence of a Nostratic proto-language
genetic relationship among several Eurasian language families
relatedConcept Borean hypothesis
Transeurasian hypothesis
surface form: Eurasiatic hypothesis

Proto-World language hypothesis
researchPeakPeriod 1960s–1990s
status minority view in linguistics
timeDepth beyond generally accepted limits of comparative method
proposed to extend back more than 10,000 years
usesMethod long-range comparison

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (2)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Indo-Pacific linguistic area contrastedWith Nostratic hypothesis
Nostratic hypothesis proposedProtoLanguage Nostratic hypothesis self-linksurface differs
this entity surface form: Proto-Nostratic