Ramsey test for conditionals
E381627
epistemic account of conditionals
philosophical theory of conditionals
semantic test for indicative conditionals
The Ramsey test for conditionals is a philosophical account of indicative conditionals that evaluates their truth by hypothetically adding the antecedent to one’s beliefs and then checking whether the consequent would be accepted.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Ramsey test for conditionals canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T3725169 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ramsey test for conditionals Context triple: [F. P. Ramsey, notableIdea, Ramsey test for conditionals]
-
A.
Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic
Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic is a landmark philosophical paper by Saul Kripke that helped found possible-worlds semantics and revolutionized the study of modal logic.
-
B.
Logical Foundations of Probability
Logical Foundations of Probability is a seminal philosophical work by Rudolf Carnap that develops a rigorous logical and formal account of probability and inductive reasoning.
-
C.
The Logic of Practice
The Logic of Practice is a major sociological work by Pierre Bourdieu that develops his influential theories of habitus, field, and symbolic power to explain how social practices are structured and reproduced.
-
D.
Carnap's continuum of inductive methods
Carnap's continuum of inductive methods is a family of formal Bayesian-style confirmation functions that systematically vary how evidence updates degrees of belief in logical probability theory.
-
E.
Logic: The Theory of Inquiry
Logic: The Theory of Inquiry is John Dewey’s major work on logic, presenting a pragmatic account of reasoning as an experimental, inquiry-driven process grounded in experience.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ramsey test for conditionals Target entity description: The Ramsey test for conditionals is a philosophical account of indicative conditionals that evaluates their truth by hypothetically adding the antecedent to one’s beliefs and then checking whether the consequent would be accepted.
-
A.
Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic
Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic is a landmark philosophical paper by Saul Kripke that helped found possible-worlds semantics and revolutionized the study of modal logic.
-
B.
Logical Foundations of Probability
Logical Foundations of Probability is a seminal philosophical work by Rudolf Carnap that develops a rigorous logical and formal account of probability and inductive reasoning.
-
C.
The Logic of Practice
The Logic of Practice is a major sociological work by Pierre Bourdieu that develops his influential theories of habitus, field, and symbolic power to explain how social practices are structured and reproduced.
-
D.
Carnap's continuum of inductive methods
Carnap's continuum of inductive methods is a family of formal Bayesian-style confirmation functions that systematically vary how evidence updates degrees of belief in logical probability theory.
-
E.
Logic: The Theory of Inquiry
Logic: The Theory of Inquiry is John Dewey’s major work on logic, presenting a pragmatic account of reasoning as an experimental, inquiry-driven process grounded in experience.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (45)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
epistemic account of conditionals
ⓘ
philosophical theory of conditionals ⓘ semantic test for indicative conditionals ⓘ |
| addresses |
the connection between conditionals and rational acceptance
ⓘ
the meaning of "if … then …" statements ⓘ |
| aimsAt | capturing ordinary speakers’ use of indicative conditionals ⓘ |
| appliesTo | indicative conditionals ⓘ |
| characterization |
acceptance-based semantics for conditionals
ⓘ
non-truth-functional account of conditionals ⓘ |
| compatibleWith | probabilistic interpretations of belief ⓘ |
| concerns | how rational agents should evaluate conditionals ⓘ |
| contrastedWith |
material conditional analysis
ⓘ
strict conditional analysis ⓘ |
| coreIdea |
after adding the antecedent, check whether the consequent would be accepted
ⓘ
evaluate a conditional by hypothetically adding its antecedent to one’s beliefs ⓘ |
| criticizedFor |
difficulties with nested and counterfactual conditionals
ⓘ
tension with certain logical principles for conditionals ⓘ |
| epistemicStatus | links acceptance of conditionals to rational belief revision ⓘ |
| field |
formal epistemology
ⓘ
logic ⓘ philosophy of language ⓘ |
| focusesOn | acceptability rather than objective truth conditions ⓘ |
| hasFormulation | "If A, then B" is acceptable iff, on hypothetically adding A to one’s beliefs and adjusting minimally, one would accept B" ⓘ |
| historicalSource | Frank P. Ramsey’s 1929 essay "General Propositions and Causality" ⓘ |
| influenced |
AGM belief revision theory
ⓘ
later theories of indicative conditionals ⓘ |
| inspired |
Adams-style probabilistic accounts of conditionals
ⓘ
suppositional theories of conditionals ⓘ |
| involves |
acceptance of the consequent
ⓘ
hypothetical belief revision ⓘ supposition of the antecedent ⓘ |
| logicalRole | connects conditionals to rules of inference and acceptance ⓘ |
| method |
suppose the antecedent minimally and revise beliefs coherently
ⓘ
then determine whether the consequent would be accepted in the revised belief state ⓘ |
| namedAfter |
F. P. Ramsey
ⓘ
surface form:
Frank P. Ramsey
|
| relatedConcept |
Stalnaker semantics
ⓘ
belief revision ⓘ conditional semantics ⓘ epistemic conditionals ⓘ possible worlds semantics ⓘ suppositional reasoning ⓘ |
| truthCondition | a conditional is acceptable if, upon supposing the antecedent, one would accept the consequent ⓘ |
| usedBy |
formal epistemologists
ⓘ
logicians ⓘ philosophers of language ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Ramsey test for conditionals Description of subject: The Ramsey test for conditionals is a philosophical account of indicative conditionals that evaluates their truth by hypothetically adding the antecedent to one’s beliefs and then checking whether the consequent would be accepted.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.