Triple
T15742191
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ramsey test for conditionals |
E381627
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | philosophical theory of conditionals |
C35814
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: philosophical theory of conditionals Context triple: [Ramsey test for conditionals, instanceOf, philosophical theory of conditionals]
-
A.
doctrine of conditional predication
The doctrine of conditional predication is a logical and philosophical principle stating that a subject can be truly predicated of a property or attribute only under certain specified conditions or circumstances.
-
B.
possible‑worlds semantics
Possible-worlds semantics is a formal framework in logic and linguistics that interprets the meaning of sentences by evaluating their truth across a range of alternative, systematically structured possible worlds.
-
C.
non-classical theory of truth
A non-classical theory of truth is an account of truth that revises or rejects classical logical principles (such as bivalence or excluded middle) to handle phenomena like vagueness, paradoxes, or semantic indeterminacy.
-
D.
theory of truth
A theory of truth is a conceptual framework that explains what it means for statements, beliefs, or propositions to be true and how their truth is determined or justified.
-
E.
theory of predication
The theory of predication is a philosophical account of how properties, relations, or attributes are meaningfully ascribed to subjects in propositions, explaining the structure and truth-conditions of statements like “S is P.”
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86d9cdb648190bf3171be0bd7d872 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:46 a.m.