Philippines v. China (PCA case)

E330622

Philippines v. China (PCA case) is a landmark 2013–2016 arbitration before the Permanent Court of Arbitration in which the Philippines successfully challenged China’s expansive maritime claims in the South China Sea under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (10)

Statements (65)

Predicate Object
instanceOf South China Sea arbitration
UNCLOS arbitration
international arbitration case
law of the sea dispute
administeredBy Permanent Court of Arbitration
alsoKnownAs Philippines v. China (PCA case)
surface form: Philippines v. China

Philippines v. China (PCA case)
surface form: Philippines v. China arbitration

Philippines v. China (PCA case)
surface form: South China Sea arbitration (Philippines v. China)
awardCharacter binding
final
category China and the Philippines
surface form: Philippines–China relations

South China Sea maritime claims
surface form: South China Sea disputes

UNCLOS case law
cases of the Permanent Court of Arbitration
ChinaParticipation People's Republic of China in diplomatic talks
surface form: China declined to participate in the arbitration
ChinaPosition China declared the award null and void
People's Republic of China in diplomatic talks
surface form: China rejected the tribunal's jurisdiction
concernsFeature Cuarteron Reef
Subi Reef
surface form: Fiery Cross Reef

South Gaven Reef
surface form: Gaven Reef

Hughes Reef
Johnson South Reef
surface form: Johnson Reef

Scarborough Reef
surface form: McKennan Reef

Mischief Reef
Scarborough Shoal
Second Thomas Shoal
Spratly Islands
Subi Reef
Whitsun Reef
concernsRegion South China Sea
decisionDate 2016-07-12
endDate 2016-07-12
filedBy Philippines
surface form: Republic of the Philippines
impact clarified interpretation of UNCLOS provisions on maritime features and entitlements
limited legal effect of historic rights claims beyond UNCLOS maritime zones
strengthened legal position of Southeast Asian coastal states in the South China Sea
initiatedByInstrument Notification and Statement of Claim
initiatingAgent Department of Foreign Affairs of the Philippines
surface form: Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs
jurisdictionDecisionDate 2015-10-29
legalBasis United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
meritsDecisionDate 2016-07-12
respondentState China
surface form: People's Republic of China
seatCountry Netherlands
seatOfArbitration The Hague
startDate 2013-01-22
subjectMatter lawfulness of certain Chinese activities in the South China Sea
legality of the nine-dash line
maritime entitlements in the South China Sea
status of maritime features under UNCLOS
tribunalFound People's Republic of China in diplomatic talks
surface form: China aggravated the dispute during the arbitration

China caused severe harm to the marine environment through land reclamation and construction activities
China constructed artificial islands and installations in the Philippines' exclusive economic zone without consent
China failed to prevent Chinese fishermen from fishing in the Philippines' exclusive economic zone
China interfered with Philippine fishing and petroleum exploration
China violated the Philippines' sovereign rights in its exclusive economic zone
China's large-scale land reclamation was incompatible with its obligations to preserve and protect the marine environment
China's nine-dash line claim has no legal basis under UNCLOS
Mischief Reef is a low-tide elevation within the Philippines' exclusive economic zone
Scarborough Shoal
surface form: Scarborough Shoal is a rock that generates only a territorial sea

Second Thomas Shoal
surface form: Second Thomas Shoal is a low-tide elevation within the Philippines' exclusive economic zone

many features in the Spratly Islands are low-tide elevations or rocks under UNCLOS
no feature in the Spratly Islands generates an exclusive economic zone
tribunalRuledOn jurisdiction and admissibility
merits
UNCLOSPartInvoked Part XV of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
surface form: Part XV of UNCLOS

Referenced by (13)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Scarborough Shoal subjectOf Philippines v. China (PCA case)
Philippine exclusive economic zone relatedInternationalCase Philippines v. China (PCA case)
this entity surface form: Philippines v. China (South China Sea arbitration)
Second Thomas Shoal associatedWith Philippines v. China (PCA case)
this entity surface form: Philippine arbitral case against China (PCA 2016)
Mischief Reef subjectOf Philippines v. China (PCA case)
this entity surface form: South China Sea arbitration (Philippines v. China)
Subi Reef subjectOf Philippines v. China (PCA case)
this entity surface form: South China Sea arbitration case (Philippines v. China)
Johnson South Reef associatedWith Philippines v. China (PCA case)
this entity surface form: South China Sea arbitration (Philippines v. China)
Scarborough Reef subjectTo Philippines v. China (PCA case)
this entity surface form: 2016 South China Sea arbitration award
Philippines v. China (PCA case) alsoKnownAs Philippines v. China (PCA case)
this entity surface form: Philippines v. China
Philippines v. China (PCA case) alsoKnownAs Philippines v. China (PCA case)
this entity surface form: Philippines v. China arbitration
Philippines v. China (PCA case) alsoKnownAs Philippines v. China (PCA case)
this entity surface form: South China Sea arbitration (Philippines v. China)
Huangyan Dao relatedInternationalRuling Philippines v. China (PCA case)
this entity surface form: 2016 South China Sea arbitration (Philippines v. China)
Bajo de Masinloc subjectOf Philippines v. China (PCA case)
this entity surface form: Philippines v. China (PCA case no. 2013-19)
Taiping Island mentionedIn Philippines v. China (PCA case)
this entity surface form: 2016 South China Sea arbitration (Philippines v. China)