Hyman Lachowsky

E318416

Hyman Lachowsky was one of the radical activists prosecuted alongside Jacob Abrams in the landmark 1919 U.S. Supreme Court free speech case Abrams v. United States.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Hyman Lachowsky canonical 2

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (40)

Predicate Object
instanceOf defendant
person
political activist
radical
areaOfActivism anti-war speech
free speech
associatedWith Jewish immigrant radical circles in New York City
anti-war activism during World War I
radical political leaflets
caseSignificance Abrams v. United States
surface form: Abrams v. United States later cited as a key step toward modern free speech protections
charge distributing leaflets critical of U.S. intervention in Russia
violating the Espionage Act of 1917
coDefendant Jacob Abrams
Jacob Schwartz
Mollie Steimer
Samuel Lipman
countryOfCitizenship United States of America
surface form: United States
governmentActionFaced federal prosecution for sedition-related offenses
hasEthnicBackground Jewish
hasOccupation political activist
historicalPeriod World War I
surface form: World War I era
ideology radical left-wing politics
involvedIn distribution of anti-war leaflets in 1918
languageSpoken Yiddish
legalCase Abrams v. United States
surface form: Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919)
legalChargeBasis leaflets urging workers to strike in munitions production
legalContext World War I-era suppression of dissent in the United States
legalOutcome conviction upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court
legalStatusInCase criminal defendant under the Espionage Act of 1917
mentionedIn historical discussions of Abrams v. United States
movement radical political activism in the United States
notableAs figure in early 20th-century U.S. free speech history
notableFor being a defendant in Abrams v. United States
opposed U.S. military intervention in the Russian Civil War
participantIn Abrams v. United States
prosecutedAlongside Jacob Abrams
relatedLegalDoctrine First Amendment free speech jurisprudence
relatedTo Holmes-Brandeis dissents in free speech cases
residence New York City
roleInEvent defendant in Abrams v. United States

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (2)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Abrams v. United States defendants Hyman Lachowsky
Jacob Schwartz coDefendantWith Hyman Lachowsky