logical positivism
E2516
Logical positivism is a 20th-century philosophical movement that emphasizes the verification of statements through empirical observation and logical analysis, rejecting metaphysics as cognitively meaningless.
Aliases (3)
Statements (54)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
epistemological doctrine
→
form of empiricism → philosophical movement → school of analytic philosophy → |
| alternativeName |
logical empiricism
→
neo-positivism → |
| associatedWork |
Language, Truth and Logic
→
The Logical Structure of the World → The Scientific Conception of the World: The Vienna Circle → |
| basedOn |
empiricism
→
formal logic → |
| corePrinciple |
anti-metaphysical stance
→
distinction between analytic and synthetic statements → emphasis on empirical observation → emphasis on logical analysis of language → meaning of a statement is its method of verification → rejection of metaphysics as cognitively meaningless → scientific worldview → verification principle → |
| criticizedBy |
Karl Popper
→
Michael Polanyi → Thomas Kuhn → W. V. O. Quine → |
| declinePeriod |
mid-20th century
→
|
| developedByGroup |
Berlin Circle
→
Vienna Circle → |
| emergedInCentury |
20th century
→
|
| historicalPeak |
1920s
→
1930s → |
| influencedBy |
Bertrand Russell
→
David Hume → Ernst Mach → Gottlob Frege → Ludwig Wittgenstein → |
| influencedByWork |
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
→
|
| keyFigure |
A. J. Ayer
→
Hans Reichenbach → Herbert Feigl → Kurt Gödel → Moritz Schlick → Otto Neurath → Philipp Frank → Rudolf Carnap → |
| legacy |
contributed to linguistic turn in philosophy
→
influenced philosophy of science → shaped analytic philosophy → |
| methodologicalStance |
reduction of theoretical terms to observational terms
→
unification of science → |
| philosophicalDomain |
epistemology
→
philosophy of language → philosophy of science → |
| positionOnEthics |
ethical statements are expressions of emotion or attitude
→
|
| positionOnMetaphysics |
metaphysical statements are meaningless
→
|
| positionOnTheology |
theological statements lack cognitive meaning
→
|