50 U.S.C. § 1547
E133086
50 U.S.C. § 1547 is the statutory provision within the War Powers Resolution that sets out key interpretive rules and limitations on how presidential and congressional powers related to the introduction of U.S. armed forces into hostilities are to be understood.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| 50 U.S.C. § 1547 canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T1171130 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: 50 U.S.C. § 1547 Context triple: [U.S. War Powers Resolution, section, 50 U.S.C. § 1547]
-
A.
United States Code
The United States Code is the official compilation and codification of the general and permanent federal statutes of the United States.
-
B.
Public Law 107-204
Public Law 107-204 is the formal designation of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, a landmark U.S. federal law that overhauled corporate governance and financial reporting standards to combat accounting fraud.
-
C.
Wheeler-Rayburn Act
The Wheeler-Rayburn Act is a New Deal-era U.S. federal law that restructured and regulated electric utility holding companies to curb monopolistic practices and protect consumers and investors.
-
D.
Public Law 107-306
Public Law 107-306 is the U.S. federal statute enacted in 2002 that, among other intelligence reforms, created the 9/11 Commission to investigate the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
-
E.
Aldrich–Vreeland Act
The Aldrich–Vreeland Act was a 1908 U.S. law that created emergency currency provisions and laid groundwork for banking reform in response to the Panic of 1907.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: 50 U.S.C. § 1547 Target entity description: 50 U.S.C. § 1547 is the statutory provision within the War Powers Resolution that sets out key interpretive rules and limitations on how presidential and congressional powers related to the introduction of U.S. armed forces into hostilities are to be understood.
-
A.
United States Code
The United States Code is the official compilation and codification of the general and permanent federal statutes of the United States.
-
B.
Public Law 107-204
Public Law 107-204 is the formal designation of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, a landmark U.S. federal law that overhauled corporate governance and financial reporting standards to combat accounting fraud.
-
C.
Wheeler-Rayburn Act
The Wheeler-Rayburn Act is a New Deal-era U.S. federal law that restructured and regulated electric utility holding companies to curb monopolistic practices and protect consumers and investors.
-
D.
Public Law 107-306
Public Law 107-306 is the U.S. federal statute enacted in 2002 that, among other intelligence reforms, created the 9/11 Commission to investigate the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
-
E.
Aldrich–Vreeland Act
The Aldrich–Vreeland Act was a 1908 U.S. law that created emergency currency provisions and laid groundwork for banking reform in response to the Panic of 1907.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States federal statute
ⓘ
provision of the War Powers Resolution ⓘ section of the United States Code ⓘ |
| addresses |
interpretation of appropriations in relation to war powers
ⓘ
interpretation of statutes in relation to war powers ⓘ interpretation of treaties in relation to war powers ⓘ |
| aimsToPrevent |
claims of implied authority for the use of force based on general statutory or treaty language
ⓘ
reliance on appropriations as implied authorization for hostilities ⓘ |
| appliesTo |
President of the United States
ⓘ
United States Congress ⓘ introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities ⓘ |
| citedIn |
congressional debates on authorization for the use of military force
ⓘ
executive branch legal opinions on war powers ⓘ legal scholarship on separation of powers ⓘ |
| clarifies |
that authority to introduce U.S. Armed Forces into hostilities is not to be inferred from any law unless such law specifically authorizes it
ⓘ
that authority to introduce U.S. Armed Forces into hostilities is not to be inferred from any provision of a treaty unless it is implemented by legislation specifically authorizing such introduction ⓘ that authority to introduce U.S. Armed Forces into hostilities is not to be inferred from any provision of law, including appropriations, unless it specifically authorizes such introduction ⓘ that authority to introduce U.S. Armed Forces into hostilities is not to be inferred from any treaty ⓘ |
| codificationTitle | Title 50 of the United States Code ⓘ |
| codifiedFrom | Section 8 of the War Powers Resolution ⓘ |
| enactedAsPartOf | Public Law 93-148 ⓘ |
| enactmentDate | 1973-11-07 ⓘ |
| governs |
interpretation of statutory authorizations for the use of military force
ⓘ
interpretation of treaties in relation to the introduction of U.S. Armed Forces into hostilities ⓘ |
| hasTitle | Interpretation of joint resolution ⓘ |
| jurisdiction |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| languageType | rule of construction ⓘ |
| legalDomain |
constitutional law
ⓘ
national security law ⓘ war powers ⓘ |
| limits |
implication of congressional authorization from appropriations measures
ⓘ
implication of congressional authorization from other statutes ⓘ implication of congressional authorization from treaties ⓘ |
| overrodeVetoOf | Richard Nixon ⓘ |
| partOf |
50 U.S.C. §§ 1541–1548
ⓘ
U.S. War Powers Resolution ⓘ
surface form:
War Powers Resolution
|
| provides |
that authority to introduce U.S. Armed Forces into hostilities shall not be inferred from any provision of law, including any provision contained in any appropriation Act, unless such provision specifically authorizes the introduction of U.S. Armed Forces into hostilities
ⓘ
that nothing in the War Powers Resolution is intended to alter the constitutional authority of Congress or the President ⓘ that specific statutory authorization for the introduction of U.S. Armed Forces into hostilities must state that it is intended to constitute such authorization ⓘ |
| purpose | to establish interpretive rules and limitations on war powers of the political branches ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
50 U.S.C. § 1541
ⓘ
50 U.S.C. § 1542 ⓘ 50 U.S.C. § 1543 ⓘ 50 U.S.C. § 1544 ⓘ 50 U.S.C. § 1545 ⓘ 50 U.S.C. § 1546 ⓘ 50 U.S.C. § 1548 ⓘ |
| setsOut | rules of construction for the War Powers Resolution ⓘ |
| subjectMatter | interpretive rules and limitations on presidential and congressional war powers ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: 50 U.S.C. § 1547 Description of subject: 50 U.S.C. § 1547 is the statutory provision within the War Powers Resolution that sets out key interpretive rules and limitations on how presidential and congressional powers related to the introduction of U.S. armed forces into hostilities are to be understood.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.