Triple

T9830602
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Oregon v. Elstad E238771 entity
Predicate constitutionalProvision P2240 FINISHED
Object Miranda v. Arizona doctrine E8268 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Miranda v. Arizona doctrine | Statement: [Oregon v. Elstad, constitutionalProvision, Miranda v. Arizona doctrine]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Miranda v. Arizona doctrine
Context triple: [Oregon v. Elstad, constitutionalProvision, Miranda v. Arizona doctrine]
  • A. Miranda v. Arizona chosen
    Miranda v. Arizona is a landmark 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the requirement for police to inform criminal suspects of their rights to remain silent and to have an attorney present during custodial interrogations.
  • B. Mapp v. Ohio
    Mapp v. Ohio is a landmark 1961 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied the exclusionary rule to the states, holding that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment cannot be used in state criminal prosecutions.
  • C. Illinois v. Gates
    Illinois v. Gates is a 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the "totality of the circumstances" test for determining whether an informant’s tip provides probable cause for issuing a search warrant.
  • D. New York v. Quarles
    New York v. Quarles is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court decision that created the "public safety" exception to the Miranda warning requirement, allowing certain unwarned statements to be admitted when needed to protect public safety.
  • E. Florida v. Jardines
    Florida v. Jardines is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that held using a drug-sniffing dog on a homeowner’s porch constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment, requiring a warrant.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca84e0dd1881909800765d1e21f735 completed March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdb3297bd88190bf8c53a4ba00e0ae completed April 2, 2026, 12:07 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69d20d2cb5108190aa15b60ea76bfa78 completed April 5, 2026, 7:20 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:32 p.m.