Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co. | Statement: [Batson v. Kentucky, laterExtendedBy, Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.]

Target entity: Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.
Context triple: [Batson v. Kentucky, laterExtendedBy, Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.]

• A. Carter v. Carter Coal Co.
  Carter v. Carter Coal Co. was a 1936 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down federal regulation of coal production as an unconstitutional overreach of Congress’s Commerce Clause powers.
• B. Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio
  Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the standards for proving employment discrimination under Title VII, prompting Congress to later revise those standards in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
• C. Lucas v. Earl
  Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
• D. National League of Cities v. Usery
  National League of Cities v. Usery was a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that temporarily limited Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause by holding that federal wage and hour regulations could not be applied to traditional state government functions.
• E. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.
  Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co. is a landmark 1955 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly defined "gross income" under the Internal Revenue Code to include punitive damages and other undeniable accessions to wealth.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.
Triple: [Batson v. Kentucky, laterExtendedBy, Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.]

Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co. is a 1991 U.S. Supreme Court case that held private litigants in civil trials cannot use peremptory challenges to exclude jurors on the basis of race.

Target entity: Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.
Target entity description: Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co. is a 1991 U.S. Supreme Court case that held private litigants in civil trials cannot use peremptory challenges to exclude jurors on the basis of race.

• A. Carter v. Carter Coal Co.
  Carter v. Carter Coal Co. was a 1936 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down federal regulation of coal production as an unconstitutional overreach of Congress’s Commerce Clause powers.
• B. Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio
  Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the standards for proving employment discrimination under Title VII, prompting Congress to later revise those standards in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
• C. Lucas v. Earl
  Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
• D. National League of Cities v. Usery
  National League of Cities v. Usery was a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that temporarily limited Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause by holding that federal wage and hour regulations could not be applied to traditional state government functions.
• E. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.
  Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co. is a landmark 1955 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly defined "gross income" under the Internal Revenue Code to include punitive damages and other undeniable accessions to wealth.
• F. None of above. chosen