Triple
T9309074
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cutter |
E223962
|
entity |
| Predicate | caseCitation |
P771
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cutter v. Wilkinson, 544 U.S. 709 (2005) |
E43462
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cutter v. Wilkinson, 544 U.S. 709 (2005) | Statement: [Cutter, caseCitation, Cutter v. Wilkinson, 544 U.S. 709 (2005)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cutter v. Wilkinson, 544 U.S. 709 (2005) Context triple: [Cutter, caseCitation, Cutter v. Wilkinson, 544 U.S. 709 (2005)]
-
A.
Cutter v. Wilkinson
chosen
Cutter v. Wilkinson is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act as applied to the religious rights of prison inmates.
-
B.
Crawford v. Washington
Crawford v. Washington is a landmark 2004 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reshaped Confrontation Clause jurisprudence by holding that testimonial hearsay is inadmissible against a criminal defendant unless the witness is unavailable and there was a prior opportunity for cross-examination.
-
C.
Windsor v. United States (in part)
Windsor v. United States (in part) is a landmark 2013 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down key portions of the Defense of Marriage Act, advancing federal recognition of same-sex marriages.
-
D.
Corrigan v. Buckley
Corrigan v. Buckley is a 1926 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the enforceability of racially restrictive covenants in property deeds, paving the way for widespread legalized housing segregation until later overturned in effect by subsequent civil rights rulings.
-
E.
Garcetti v. Ceballos
Garcetti v. Ceballos is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that public employees do not have First Amendment protection for speech made pursuant to their official job duties.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8424d0f08190831e2e93c6533aeb |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd1daba67c819081d53545d67ef127 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 1:29 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d0e39d03508190aca18600c33bfdd8 |
completed | April 4, 2026, 10:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:37 p.m.