Triple
T913791
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bourbon Reforms |
E19722
|
entity |
| Predicate | increasedPowerOf |
P13002
|
FINISHED |
| Object | peninsular officials |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: peninsular officials | Statement: [Bourbon Reforms, increasedPowerOf, peninsular officials]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: increasedPowerOf Context triple: [Bourbon Reforms, increasedPowerOf, peninsular officials]
-
A.
powerBy
Indicates that one entity operates, functions, or is made possible through the energy, resources, or enabling capabilities provided by another entity.
-
B.
regainedPowerIn
Indicates that an entity has recovered or reestablished its previous level of power, control, or authority within a specified context or domain.
-
C.
inPower
Indicates that one entity currently holds governing authority, control, or leadership over a group, organization, or domain.
-
D.
strengthensFrom
chosen
Indicates that one entity becomes stronger, more effective, or more intense as a result of influence, support, or input from another entity.
-
E.
exclusivePower
Indicates that one entity holds sole authority or control over another entity or a specific domain, excluding others from sharing that power.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4939f91a08190ba68c2c81eab90fe |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b6755c488190b7f7848110e3ea2c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b292d3408190947cbc2f794cf8c5 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:41 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:39 p.m.