Triple
T9128366
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hadean Eon |
E219020
|
entity |
| Predicate | possibleBiologicalEvidence |
P3650
|
FINISHED |
| Object | highly debated isotopic signatures |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: highly debated isotopic signatures | Statement: [Hadean Eon, possibleBiologicalEvidence, highly debated isotopic signatures]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: possibleBiologicalEvidence Context triple: [Hadean Eon, possibleBiologicalEvidence, highly debated isotopic signatures]
-
A.
hasGeneticEvidence
Indicates that there is genetic data or analysis supporting the existence, validity, or nature of the specified relationship or association between entities.
-
B.
providesEvidenceFor
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as support, justification, or proof for the validity or truth of another entity.
-
C.
hasGeologicalEvidenceOf
Indicates that there is geological data or features supporting the existence, occurrence, or impact of a specified phenomenon or event.
-
D.
hasMaterialEvidence
Indicates that there exists tangible, physical evidence supporting or associated with a particular entity, event, or claim.
-
E.
hasNoEvidenceOf
Indicates that there is no supporting proof, data, or documentation confirming the existence or occurrence of the referenced condition, event, or relationship.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83debfc0819095800583e97ab10f |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cca8cad9c0819082d61f53865ef0b4 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc6601d77881908299d58db6e64937 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:25 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:18 p.m.