Triple
T8698156
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Quechuan |
E206453
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Andean language family |
C3517
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Andean language family Context triple: [Quechuan, instanceOf, Andean language family]
-
A.
Andean language
chosen
An Andean language is any of the indigenous languages historically spoken in the Andean region of South America, such as Quechua and Aymara, characterized by rich agglutinative morphology and deep cultural significance.
-
B.
Uto-Aztecan language branch
The Uto-Aztecan language branch is a family of Indigenous languages spread from the western United States through northern and central Mexico, including well-known languages such as Nahuatl, Hopi, and Ute.
-
C.
Uto-Aztecan language
A Uto-Aztecan language is a member of a Native American language family spoken from the western United States through northern and central Mexico, sharing common ancestral linguistic features despite diverse cultures and regions.
-
D.
Cordilleran language
A Cordilleran language is a member of a proposed subgroup of the Austronesian language family spoken in the Cordillera mountain region of northern Luzon in the Philippines, characterized by shared phonological, lexical, and grammatical features distinct from neighboring language groups.
-
E.
Oto-Manguean language
An Oto-Manguean language is a member of a large, diverse family of indigenous Mesoamerican languages, primarily spoken in Mexico, characterized by complex tonal systems and significant grammatical and phonological variation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83555b6c8190abe930dd397e863b |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:34 p.m.