Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908) | Statement: [Muller v. Oregon brief, citedIn, Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908)]

Target entity: Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908)
Context triple: [Muller v. Oregon brief, citedIn, Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908)]

• A. Muller v. Oregon chosen
  Muller v. Oregon is a landmark 1908 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld limits on women’s working hours, notable for its pioneering use of sociological and empirical data in legal argumentation.
• B. Muller v. Oregon brief
  The Muller v. Oregon brief is a landmark 1908 legal document, authored by Louis D. Brandeis, that pioneered the use of extensive social science data to defend labor regulations, particularly limiting women’s working hours.
• C. Lochner v. New York
  Lochner v. New York is a landmark 1905 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a state labor regulation and became emblematic of the era in which the Court used substantive due process to protect economic liberty and limit government regulation of business.
• D. Hammer v. Dagenhart
  Hammer v. Dagenhart was a 1918 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down federal child labor regulations under the Commerce Clause, later repudiated as a symbol of restrictive interpretations of federal power.
• E. De Jonge v. Oregon
  De Jonge v. Oregon is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the right to peaceful assembly is a fundamental liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and thus applies to the states.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.