Triple

T8252837
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Humphrey’s Executor v. United States E192996 entity
Predicate reinforcedDoctrine P81207 FINISHED
Object independence of administrative agencies LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: independence of administrative agencies | Statement: [Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, reinforcedDoctrine, independence of administrative agencies]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reinforcedDoctrine
Context triple: [Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, reinforcedDoctrine, independence of administrative agencies]
  • A. confirmedDoctrine
    Indicates that an authority has officially validated, endorsed, or ratified a particular doctrine as true or acceptable.
  • B. appliedDoctrine
    Indicates that a particular doctrine, principle, or rule has been put into practice or used in interpreting or deciding a specific case, situation, or context.
  • C. proposesDoctrine
    Indicates that one entity formally puts forward or advocates a particular doctrine, theory, or set of principles for consideration or adoption by others.
  • D. encouragedDoctrine
    Indicates that an entity actively promoted or urged others to adopt or follow a particular doctrine or set of beliefs.
  • E. reinforcedIn
    Indicates that one entity is strengthened, supported, or made more robust within, or as a result of conditions in, another entity or context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82dfad9c8190b8cd18fb89f50f40 completed March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb78cbc7cc81909931440e95d6e691 completed March 31, 2026, 7:33 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb36b6d5548190b665a6cce14c69f7 completed March 31, 2026, 2:51 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cb44d1caa881909069fa925a91316b completed March 31, 2026, 3:51 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:48 p.m.