Triple
T808823
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Reed v. Reed |
E17496
|
entity |
| Predicate | rejectedJustification |
P21299
|
FINISHED |
| Object | administrative convenience as a basis for sex-based classification |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: administrative convenience as a basis for sex-based classification | Statement: [Reed v. Reed, rejectedJustification, administrative convenience as a basis for sex-based classification]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rejectedJustification Context triple: [Reed v. Reed, rejectedJustification, administrative convenience as a basis for sex-based classification]
-
A.
rejectedBy
Indicates that one entity has been refused, dismissed, or not accepted by another entity.
-
B.
rejectedAward
Indicates that an entity refused to accept or declined an award that was offered or granted to it.
-
C.
rejectedClaim
Indicates that one party has refused to accept, approve, or validate a claim made by another party.
-
D.
justification
Indicates that one entity provides a reason, explanation, or supporting argument for the existence, validity, or appropriateness of another entity or claim.
-
E.
rejectedOrModifiedBy
Indicates that a proposal, request, or item was either not accepted as-is or was altered by a particular agent or authority.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4937ae8a08190b5084a03d532b30e |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4ac07fedc8190ab05595f25c1792f |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4aa7221c081908068e66fe720f26d |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:06 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4ac0688708190b62ac0a8239ec8c8 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:13 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:38 p.m.