Triple

T8083763
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Borda count E188679 entity
Predicate aggregationType P75567 FINISHED
Object preference aggregation method LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: preference aggregation method | Statement: [Borda count, aggregationType, preference aggregation method]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: aggregationType
Context triple: [Borda count, aggregationType, preference aggregation method]
  • A. aggregationProperty
    Indicates that one entity serves as an aggregation or summary of values or instances associated with another entity.
  • B. dataAggregation chosen
    Indicates the process by which multiple data points or datasets are combined into a summarized or consolidated form.
  • C. quantificationType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of quantity or measurement being applied in a given context.
  • D. calculationType
    Indicates the specific method, formula, or approach used to perform a calculation in the described relationship.
  • E. statisticsType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of statistical measure or analysis associated with an entity or dataset.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82b662e88190b9323daab8c28a21 completed March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb415e61ac81909e924aea69a7ff77 completed March 31, 2026, 3:37 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb049f1614819087360d1a4c6f0faa completed March 30, 2026, 11:17 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:29 p.m.